12-10-2018, 01:47 AM
(12-10-2018, 12:34 AM)PaulP link Wrote:His work has nothing to do with invalidating science - his work has to do with simultaneously getting materialist science to understand its limits and also to get materialist science to accept other valid ways of looking at the world, that lie outside its comfort zone.
There are no different sciences, that's reads like an attempt to label science from a dogmatic perspective like all the different religions.
There is only science and the scientific method, there are different categories of knowledge which are built on science and the scientific method.
Discussion around different sciences is a limitation of language and human perception.
"Ruck, ruck, ruck, ruck ....... Ruck, ruck, ruck, ruck"

