12-10-2018, 12:38 AM
(12-10-2018, 12:34 AM)PaulP link Wrote:His work has nothing to do with invalidating science - his work has to do with simultaneously getting materialist science to understand its limits and also to get materialist science to accept other valid ways of looking at the world, that lie outside its comfort zone.
Suggesting that science is based on ten dogmas that don't stand up to scrutiny seems pretty invalidating to me.
Only our ruthless best, from Board to bootstudders will get us no. 17

