SSM Plebiscite

[LP]

Kate Jenkins is simply recounting the stories and experiences that she herself has been told. And you do realise that the article you quoted only contains one sentence about gay women being converted, in a piece that is around 1000 words long and covers many other related issues ? And the headline was not chosen by Jenkins.

No doubt that is reality PaulP.

But Jenkins carries the banner, she is the torch bearer, and that line is a door left wide open in a pre-prepared article! It's akin to leaving lollies on the bench and telling a room full of children don't touch as you walk out the door!

If she claims the editor was political or malicious, isn't that like blaming the cat for stealing the steak if you leave it unattended on the bench?

Is it simple naivety, or naivety by choice?

I must admit, I do hold people who are in positions of authority and public profile to a higher standard!