10-31-2018, 12:35 PM
(10-31-2018, 12:01 PM)LP link Wrote:The following line in the article caught my eye.
In intent perhaps, in practice in cases like this hardly, they are often far more subjective than objective!
It's a civil case so the burden of proof is lower but it's still based on a subjective judgement. "Objective truth" is probably not a thing, particularly when you're dealing with the perceptions of folk who are over 40 years apart in age.
“Why don’t you knock it off with them negative waves? Why don’t you dig how beautiful it is out here? Why don’t you say something righteous and hopeful for a change?” Oddball

