10-30-2018, 11:35 AM
(10-30-2018, 05:43 AM)LP link Wrote:A sensible response that is free of political, social or moral agenda.
I have one associate who works in a similar area of the arts, projects they get involved in are like those of Rush and they are not developed overnight. They are planned years out, it's surprising to know how far out some of these endeavors start, not months but years! I find it an uncomfortable assertion from the Rush camp, and the Wilson camp before that, and the claims by their supporters, that opportunities dried up effectively overnight. Because if they were busy they would have been working on projects 2 or 3 years out from completion with a lot of money already invested. Not something that investors will generally throw out with the bathwater, or when a court date is not yet even set in a such civil case!
Yes, the forward planning works - so he would currently be working on projects or not, his choice or not, but then the offers come in for films, plays etc for a couple of years time and his name is no longer on the contact list. If he is working currently, he could be pulled from that work, as the company doesn't want the association. The company would work with investors to suggest alternatives. He would be well sought after (much more than Wilson, I would think) so his agent would know about the volume of offers coming in.