(10-30-2018, 05:09 AM)PaulP link Wrote:The parallels between a surge in work, profile etc., between reality TV folks and accusers are perfectly valid.
I don't think so, the subject of this thread is the potential for coordinated activity on either side.
There are questions on both sides that should leave the reasonable person feeling uncomfortable, and I see no reason to favor one side above the other!
In the Rush case, his accuser doesn't pay, this isn't a case between the accused and the accuser, yet the accuser testifies! Through hate, justice or reward?
Rush could be rewarded, while he risks costs he could also be assessed as placing a bet!
If there is no benefit what motives of his accuser, I'm rightly led to believe that in genuine circumstances these are deeply private, personal and embarrassing situations causing grief and disenchantment. Yet I see a smiling, perhaps even parading, débutante leaving the court! Why participate in the media organizations litigation, this is a civil case isn't it?
Am I to be expected to assume it is of good intention, if so explain why on what grounds?
Further to today's events, why the sudden change in the defense plea have they discovered a liability or exposed a fraud?
"Ruck, ruck, ruck, ruck ....... Ruck, ruck, ruck, ruck"