06-25-2015, 04:34 AM
You guys are one trick ponies. You got it wrong, is a far cry from thinking things through and analysing anything.
I'll give you a clue.
Chris Judd had no issues giving his all.
Why does anyone else? Why is he different?
Forget Malthouse, this isn't about him. Or you can pretend it is and that we didn't let a 29 point lead slip to a 3 point lead and you can also ignore that our first 6 goals were scores from port Adelaide's errors.
Now the game plan is a factor and currently going flat stick seems to be the way to play. Port are showing that unless you are super fit this won't always work.
What if they reduce rotations further? Will it be more open? Or more contested?
Think about it. I'm pleased and worried about a difference in commitment. it's encouraging to see, but worrying that it can return as soon as the emotional highs start to peeter out.
I'll give you a clue.
Chris Judd had no issues giving his all.
Why does anyone else? Why is he different?
Forget Malthouse, this isn't about him. Or you can pretend it is and that we didn't let a 29 point lead slip to a 3 point lead and you can also ignore that our first 6 goals were scores from port Adelaide's errors.
Now the game plan is a factor and currently going flat stick seems to be the way to play. Port are showing that unless you are super fit this won't always work.
What if they reduce rotations further? Will it be more open? Or more contested?
Think about it. I'm pleased and worried about a difference in commitment. it's encouraging to see, but worrying that it can return as soon as the emotional highs start to peeter out.
"everything you know is wrong"
Paul Hewson
Paul Hewson

