Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2018 Rd 20: Post Game Calm & Civilized Discussion: Carlton vs GWS
(08-07-2018, 01:21 AM)shawny link Wrote:Post 100% nailed it!

Our rebuild would look very different if we managed to get some decent output from the likes of mature pick ups such as Mullett, Garlett, Phillips, Shaw, O'shea, ASOS, Pickett and this years Kennedy, Lang and Lobbe....sadly doesn't end there add in ones that are no longer on list like Sumner, Palmer, Smedts, Gorridge. OMG this is sad.

I think the kids are on track but the trading of mature age players is awful and a big reason we are so heavily exposed until more games are into the kids.

Marchbank and Plowman are 2 ticks in the Bolten era with Kerridge a pass as well IMO.  Lang, Kennedy and Lobbe deserve another season before rating accurately but still haven't set the world on fire in what we have seen so far regardless of excuses.

Not a great average and something that this draft can afford another lot of mature cloggers. 

Indeed. It is not wrong to want some experienced players to build a team around, but many of these guys have not performed as we would hope.

Mullett:
Mullett hasn't been a success. Granted he was only selected because we needed an experienced player as a back-up, but he doesn't do what we need on the field.
This one is a definite fail.
Garlett:
Early in the season Garlett looked like being a big win. However, his recent form and effort has been substandard: the intensity has gone, the tackling pressure has gone, the run has gone and the shots on goal have gone. I won't right him off yet, and he cost us next to nothing, but he is going to have to show a lot more to be a long term senior player.
Looking like a fail.
Phillips:
Phillips was a speculative pick as much as anything. He needed to have a consistent time at senior level to see if we was going to be the answer. However, he has struggled to remain on the field. Injuries have really held him back.
At this point his future with us is looking questionable, but that is not the fault of poor recruiting.
Maybe not a fail, but not the success we were hoping for.
Shaw:
Shaw may get another year, but if he does, he will be taking a spot a kid with potential would preferentially occupy. Shaw has not been able to dominate at VFL level, although he has been solid. I am not sure exactly what the club saw in him.
Fail
O'Shea:
O'Shea has really disappointed me. He was so good in the VFL last year that it was a no-brainer to give him a senior chance. Even then, he was selected as a back-up for younger players. However, with our injuries we have needed O'Shea to stand up and he hasn't been able to. Nor has he been able to show anything like the form in the VFL, on the rare occasion that he has been available.
O'Shea does have some positives: he tries to do a job, he works at his game and he is persistent. He is a good role model on the training track. He is just not looking like he has what is required to be a significant contributor at senior level.
Alas, O'Shea has to be a fail.
Alex Silvagni:
Like Phillips, Silvagni was chosen as a bit of speculation to be a role model for our young defenders. In that area he has been a massive success. He has also been a huge success when he has managed to get onto the field. But injuries have simply ruined him. He can't get on the park.
Silvagni may well be offered an off field position, as he is highly respected.
I am glad we selected him, even thought I was sceptical at the start. Injuries have robbed us of exactly the player we have needed.
Pickett:
Pickett was another cheap, speculative pick and one that might work out yet. His best has been extremely promising. But he has not often produced his best, mostly due to injuries. Like a couple of others, I wouldn't discard Pickett yet, but he does need time in the VFL to work on his fitness and touch.
Not a total fail yet, but not looking the way we would have preferred.
Kennedy:
Kennedy is quite a young player. I would think of discarding him yet. However, he does not appear to be the solid bodied mid we need yet. He has been very slow and his kicking has been erratic.
Looks like a fail.
Lang:
Honestly, I don't know why the club were so keen on him. Yes, he has some pace and his kicking for goal is quite good, but he has shown no intensity so far. He appears to have no defensive side at all and does not contribute on the inside. I'm willing to give him some benefit because of his injuries, but I really want to see some intensity and desire.
Looking seriously like a fail.

Lobbe:
Live Long and Prosper!
Reply


Messages In This Thread
Re: 2018 Rd 20: Post Game Calm & Civilized Discussion: Carlton vs GWS - by crashlander - 08-07-2018, 02:25 AM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)