07-23-2018, 08:59 PM
Needed analysis to determine how Smith gets his possessions. If he is a high hand ball received kind of player you clamp down on the earlier link in the chain - Mitchell. That's Barkers job, you know the master strategist in the box who clearly has mastered snakes and ladders, not chess.
Personally I would have clamped Mitchell and as I said pre-match, run LoB on Smith. Smith is a high impact player but can't impact if he hasn't got the pill. These moves are so obvious I start thinking about the old tanking chestnut.
I've mentioned this more than once - BB gets the heat but WTF do blokes like Barker contribute?
Personally I would have clamped Mitchell and as I said pre-match, run LoB on Smith. Smith is a high impact player but can't impact if he hasn't got the pill. These moves are so obvious I start thinking about the old tanking chestnut.
I've mentioned this more than once - BB gets the heat but WTF do blokes like Barker contribute?
DrE is no more... you ok with that harmonica man?

