07-15-2018, 12:54 PM
Barb - saw both at the game and the right decisions were made - Simpson was trying to get it down the middle as far as he could, dunno what Daisy was thinking!
There have probably been two such decisions for the year! Players are getting away with a lot more regarding fifty metre penalties not being paid for knocking the ball out of hands, and being late to the contest as well.
As a curiosity, we had a fifty paid against us where the interchange bench was. Does anyone know if it was paid because a player coming onto the ground encroached the 10m zone? If so, what a ridiculous rule - surely if they are not part of the play, who cares where they are - amend the rule so that you can be close, but not interfere in the play, if you do 50m.
There have probably been two such decisions for the year! Players are getting away with a lot more regarding fifty metre penalties not being paid for knocking the ball out of hands, and being late to the contest as well.
As a curiosity, we had a fifty paid against us where the interchange bench was. Does anyone know if it was paid because a player coming onto the ground encroached the 10m zone? If so, what a ridiculous rule - surely if they are not part of the play, who cares where they are - amend the rule so that you can be close, but not interfere in the play, if you do 50m.