05-16-2018, 06:25 AM
To me, manifestly inadequate is a worry from the AFL. $1000 vs one week is a bit of the same thing (although 1 week loses eligibility for the Brownlow and doesn't penalise the team.
Manifestly inadequate would mean they want at least 2 weeks, maybe 3 or more as has been suggested in the media.
They are both trivial and have been stirred up way out of proportion.
May's action could have been careless, but more likely too contact an umpire. Surely Ziebell's kneeing was worse much greater potential for thuggery in other levels of the game. Can other clubs appeal decisions?
Manifestly inadequate would mean they want at least 2 weeks, maybe 3 or more as has been suggested in the media.
They are both trivial and have been stirred up way out of proportion.
May's action could have been careless, but more likely too contact an umpire. Surely Ziebell's kneeing was worse much greater potential for thuggery in other levels of the game. Can other clubs appeal decisions?