05-06-2018, 01:17 AM
I've been thinking about this a little and the decision between Jones and weitering can be highlighted thus:
Weitering is a smarter defender than Jones. He uses it better, will sum up options better and will run faster than he does today and is a future player who can play right now. He won't get rag dolled for too much longer, and will probably rely on his smarts and strength rather than athleticism.
Jones best is the best in the league BUT it comes with the caveat that he relies so heavily on his closing speed and ability to leave a man and go help someone else. He's capable of winning and losing a match all in the same quarter.
If you want a reliable ten year defender weitering plays. If you want a highlight reel it's Jones. The other alternative is teach them to play together. They've shared a defense for what 8 matches? Sometimes these things take time.
Marchbank is a different type IMHO. He's athletic but he's no key position player.
Weitering is a smarter defender than Jones. He uses it better, will sum up options better and will run faster than he does today and is a future player who can play right now. He won't get rag dolled for too much longer, and will probably rely on his smarts and strength rather than athleticism.
Jones best is the best in the league BUT it comes with the caveat that he relies so heavily on his closing speed and ability to leave a man and go help someone else. He's capable of winning and losing a match all in the same quarter.
If you want a reliable ten year defender weitering plays. If you want a highlight reel it's Jones. The other alternative is teach them to play together. They've shared a defense for what 8 matches? Sometimes these things take time.
Marchbank is a different type IMHO. He's athletic but he's no key position player.
"everything you know is wrong"
Paul Hewson
Paul Hewson