(04-27-2018, 08:48 PM)madbluboy link Wrote:Dogs had 5 players who have played less than 10 games, we really need to stop with the excuses.
See, this type of stat $hits me.
Yes, it is correct. But why pick 10?
What about 4 games or less? We had 3, they had 2.
Why not 30 games? or better yet, lets make it 33 games. From the 2 sides that ran out there last night...
Carlton had 10 players who have played less than 33 games.
Doggies had 7 players who have played less than 33 games.
Sure, they had less games on average than us too. But is the gap really that big?
Lets take the 2 most experienced players out of each team. (Simpson and Daisy, Suckling and Dalhaus)
You know the average amount of games played from the remaining 20 players
Carlton - 49.9
Dogs - 46.9
3 games difference between the rest. I'm sure the average age stats would show similar, but i CBF working them out too. Due to having 2 veterans on our list in Simpson and Thomas, it makes us appear a lot older and more experienced than the dogs, buts its just not the case.
Yes, they showed injury list of 2 teams.
I didn't see Picketts name on our list....nor did i see A. Silvagnis. I'm sure there are a couple of more that i've missed.
Dogs home game. Favourable comparisons.