04-22-2018, 07:23 AM
(04-22-2018, 07:03 AM)Thryleon link Wrote:Charlie Curnow was much more prominent more frequently and hit the scoreboard less.
It's workrate and application not anything else.
That's been McKay's problem at lower levels as well, at the moment he's a 50% player, he needs to learn to be switched on all the time. I think he said as much in his post match interview when they asked him about the difference at AFL level.
It's the main reason most of us thought Kerr was the better option at the moment.
"Ruck, ruck, ruck, ruck ....... Ruck, ruck, ruck, ruck"