(04-03-2018, 07:34 AM)kruddler link Wrote:Contention: Casboult is a leader.
Explanation: He has been in the AFL system for a long time, is an older player in AFL terms.
Comparison: Jake Stringer, Kurt Tippett, Jack Watts
Conclusion: Bollocks. Plenty of senior players are not role models. Most get moved on, but nobody wanted Casboult.
Every argument based on the above contention is therefor deemed null and void as initial contention is incorrect.
Here end the lesson.
So a Role model is a Leader? :o
btw., Who used the "Leader" word in the Casboult context, if I did feel free to link to it!
Any argument based on the above contention is therefor deemed null and void as initial contention that a role model is a leader is incorrect. A role model may be a leader, but they are not dependent terms even if they had been mutually stated. Here endeth the lesson.
PS; I think what you have offered is technically called an Ambiguity of Cross Reference, or it may be a Lexical Ambiguity like a Polysemy, it's all Greek to me! ;D
"Ruck, ruck, ruck, ruck ....... Ruck, ruck, ruck, ruck"