03-06-2018, 10:07 PM
https://www.theage.com.au/sport/cricket/...4z354.html
Maybe the Saffers have told a few porkies in an endeavour to save their skin....if that is proven - that De Kock was out of line - and Warner had not inappropriately insulted on onfield, not sure how Warner gets a higher penalty?
But again, Warner should not have reacted the way he did - in any circumstance imo.
Maybe the Saffers have told a few porkies in an endeavour to save their skin....if that is proven - that De Kock was out of line - and Warner had not inappropriately insulted on onfield, not sure how Warner gets a higher penalty?
But again, Warner should not have reacted the way he did - in any circumstance imo.
Finals, then 4 in a row!

