(02-08-2018, 10:58 PM)mateinone link Wrote:When you bring a player in on top 3 wages to a club and they sit somewhere around 18-25 on the list for effectiveness that is a disaster.
..................
So I am going to actually not reply to the Daisy stuff here.
I can see why.
By AFL Tables Daisy ranked 10th in 2017, 12th in 2016 and 19th in 2015(Only five games). This is based on Supercoach or DreamTeam averages from Footywire or AFL Tables, which seems to be a reasonable way to get to a players relative effectiveness. For Daisy this is nowhere near as bad as some would have us think.
I suppose someone could argue that the stats are misleading, if so then why quote erroneous figures in the first place?
Stats that aren't facts are too easily exposed as deceptive or misleading! It makes an argument come across as emotive, irrational and subjective rather than objective, rational and factual.
Do you think I am being unfair?
I find it odd people slam me for potting Casboult, then slam me for defending Daisy. Casboult ranked 18th, 23rd and 18th in the same years that Daisy ranked 10th, 12th and 19th, yet Casboult's OK and Daisy is rubbish!
"Ruck, ruck, ruck, ruck ....... Ruck, ruck, ruck, ruck"