Leadership Group 2018

[mateinone]

His recruitment wasn't terrible, his remuneration was!

Connecting the two is unrealistic, it's not Daisy's fault, the anger should be directed elsewhere.

Are you serious?
Of course the two are connected. It was Daisy that was demanding the salary that was to be paid.
The recruitment of him absolutely is tied to his remuneration. An integral part of the recruitment of any person to any organization is their salary.

His recruitment was terrible because there is no way he was coming on half the money which is still more (bu much closer to the mark) than the value he has given the club over the course of that 1st contract.

I am flabbergasted as to how anyone could consider the recruitment of Daisy wasn't a disaster. I would be far more stunned if there was any list manager in the competition who would consider it anything but.

When you bring a player in on top 3 wages to a club and they sit somewhere around 18-25 on the list for effectiveness that is a disaster.
Perhaps (despite the public comments to the contrary) we keep Betts if we don't pay that sort of money for Daisy and perhaps we try and throw that sort of money at an Ollie Wines or some other player (remember this was huge coin).

Anyway it is obvious that as clear as it is to me that Dasiy was a recruiting disaster, to others it is just as clear it wasn't and nothing said is making any difference on changing opinions.
So I am going to actually not reply to the Daisy stuff here, except in direct relationship to the leadership group, because despite saying I wouldn't only a few posts back.. I have really helped get this topic way off track.