10-25-2017, 08:13 AM
(10-25-2017, 07:59 AM)flyboy77 link Wrote:One thing I am is a maths geek...you were being cute with the numbers. And at no stage did I say these young blokes would do the majority of the heavy lifting in 2018.
Now 2018 2019
Kennedy 19 41 63
Lang 44 66 88
Marchy 23 45 67
Plowman 60 82 104
SoJ 28 50 72
SPS 20 42 64
Fisher 15 37 59
Willo 15 37 59
Macreadie 8 30 52
Curnow 27 49 71
Weitering 42 64 86
Cuners 11 33 55
Pickett 10 32 54
Being cute with the numbers?
Please tell me where i was being cute with the numbers.
I also made a table...
Plowman (60) (82)
Lang (44) (66)
Weitering (42) (64)
Jack (28) (50)
Curnowfides (27) (49)
Marchbank (23) (45)
Kennedy (19) (41)
SPS (20) (42)
Fisher (17) (39)
Williamson (15) (37)
Cunnington (11) (33)
Pickett (10) (32)
Macreadie (8) (30)
Harry (2) (24)
#3 (0) (22)
#10 (0) (22)
I made it easier for you to see that there was nothing 'cute' about the numbers, they are the numbers.
I stand by my comments.
You didn't say they would be doing the heavy lifting, but you did say they hold the key to our immediate future. If they are to get anywhere near the amount of games you sugggest they do, then they need to be playing each week. If they are playing each week then there is only spots for 6 other players in the 22. So, considering the make up 72% of the team, i'd say they are doing the heavy lifting.
Now, IF they are not going to play all 22 games, or anywhere near it, then that backs up my original argument further....you are ahead of yourself in terms of where they are in terms of expected output of 50-70 game players.
So, for a maths geek, you seem to be missing something pretty obvious as the numbers and your take on them, don't stack up for 2018. 2019, perhaps.