09-23-2017, 03:45 AM
The problem with the afl pa though MBB has to be obvious
For example, who would Jaksch have selected this year?
Or Palmer?
The only way the aflpa could equate is if players selected the top players after each game. Most players who voted for either Jude or amurphy or another would be picking it based on zero encounters, with the next lot having played them once and a small amount having played twice.
All systems are flawed and you can't use any one award to determine a allures value, including coaches award. But I think the coaches probably get it right the most, then the aflpa then the Brownlow
That is just out of the major awards
For example, who would Jaksch have selected this year?
Or Palmer?
The only way the aflpa could equate is if players selected the top players after each game. Most players who voted for either Jude or amurphy or another would be picking it based on zero encounters, with the next lot having played them once and a small amount having played twice.
All systems are flawed and you can't use any one award to determine a allures value, including coaches award. But I think the coaches probably get it right the most, then the aflpa then the Brownlow
That is just out of the major awards
Goals for 2017
=============
Play the most anti-social football in the AFL
=============
Play the most anti-social football in the AFL

