08-17-2017, 03:21 AM
(This post was last modified: 09-06-2017, 02:10 AM by crashlander.)
Rd 20: Carlton vs Essendon
A typical game this season: just not being able to do it in the end. We had our chances, but we couldn't make them count.
[1] The rating this week was much higher (8.17, which is between a C and C+) and that does give a fair indication of what we produced.
[2] 15 different layers managed a mention this week. That does show just how all round this performance was.
[3] We did not have a large voting group this week. 14 people voted. Thank you to all who did. This was one better than the corresponding game last year.
Votes:
Kreuzer, Matthew 248
Jones, Liam 222
Murphy, Marc 193
Petrevski - Seton, Sam 128
Wright, Matthew 125
Docherty, Sam 102
Gibbs, Bryce 82
Thomas, Dale 50
Plowman, Lachlan 35
Casboult, Levi 12
Kerridge, Sam 12
Silvagni, Jack 6
Pickett, Jarrod 6
Curnow, Charles 3
Simpson, Kade 3
Progressives:
3672 - Kreuzer, Matthew (0)
2888 - Murphy, Marc (0)
2817 - Docherty, Sam (0)
2287 - Gibbs, Bryce (0)
1615 - Cripps, Patrick (0)
1101 - Jones, Liam (0)
1085 - Curnow, Charles (0)
826 - Simpson, Kade (0)
801 - Wright, Matthew (0)
789 - Casboult, Levi (0)
724 - Plowman, Lachlan (0)
663 - Curnow, Edward (0)
645 - Petrevski - Seton, Sam (0)
432 - Marchbank, Caleb (0)
405 - Rowe, Sam (0)
401 - Silvagni, Alex (0)
318 - Silvagni, Jack (0)
295 - Kerridge, Sam (0)
165 - Thomas, Dale (0)
155 - Weitering, Jacob (0)
108 - Williamson, Tom (0)
80 - Cuningham, David (0)
79 - White, Simon (0)
71 - Fisher, Zac (0)
69 - Graham, Nick (0)
44 - McKay, Harrison (0)
27 - Macreadie, Harrison (0)
9 - Pickett, Jarrod (0)
7 - Lamb, Jed (0)
3 - Boekhorst, Blaine (0)
Kreuzer probably has it won at this point. A 600+ vote lead with only a few rounds to go suggests he'll win. 2nd and 3rd, however, are very lose indeed. Murphy or Docherty will be 2nd and third, but the order is far from set.
Gibbs and Cripps look pretty safe, but the only certainty is that we will be there.
A typical game this season: just not being able to do it in the end. We had our chances, but we couldn't make them count.
[1] The rating this week was much higher (8.17, which is between a C and C+) and that does give a fair indication of what we produced.
[2] 15 different layers managed a mention this week. That does show just how all round this performance was.
[3] We did not have a large voting group this week. 14 people voted. Thank you to all who did. This was one better than the corresponding game last year.
Votes:
Kreuzer, Matthew 248
Jones, Liam 222
Murphy, Marc 193
Petrevski - Seton, Sam 128
Wright, Matthew 125
Docherty, Sam 102
Gibbs, Bryce 82
Thomas, Dale 50
Plowman, Lachlan 35
Casboult, Levi 12
Kerridge, Sam 12
Silvagni, Jack 6
Pickett, Jarrod 6
Curnow, Charles 3
Simpson, Kade 3
Progressives:
3672 - Kreuzer, Matthew (0)
2888 - Murphy, Marc (0)
2817 - Docherty, Sam (0)
2287 - Gibbs, Bryce (0)
1615 - Cripps, Patrick (0)
1101 - Jones, Liam (0)
1085 - Curnow, Charles (0)
826 - Simpson, Kade (0)
801 - Wright, Matthew (0)
789 - Casboult, Levi (0)
724 - Plowman, Lachlan (0)
663 - Curnow, Edward (0)
645 - Petrevski - Seton, Sam (0)
432 - Marchbank, Caleb (0)
405 - Rowe, Sam (0)
401 - Silvagni, Alex (0)
318 - Silvagni, Jack (0)
295 - Kerridge, Sam (0)
165 - Thomas, Dale (0)
155 - Weitering, Jacob (0)
108 - Williamson, Tom (0)
80 - Cuningham, David (0)
79 - White, Simon (0)
71 - Fisher, Zac (0)
69 - Graham, Nick (0)
44 - McKay, Harrison (0)
27 - Macreadie, Harrison (0)
9 - Pickett, Jarrod (0)
7 - Lamb, Jed (0)
3 - Boekhorst, Blaine (0)
Kreuzer probably has it won at this point. A 600+ vote lead with only a few rounds to go suggests he'll win. 2nd and 3rd, however, are very lose indeed. Murphy or Docherty will be 2nd and third, but the order is far from set.
Gibbs and Cripps look pretty safe, but the only certainty is that we will be there.
Live Long and Prosper!