Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2017 Jim Park Medal Analysis:
#36
RD 18: Carlton vs Brisbane
What a disaster!
[1] Only 11 people voted this week, 5 less than last year's game. t is one of the lowest turnouts for the year. But it was in Brisbane and NOT on free to air TV.
I didn't vote: I didn't even see any highlights, let alone a significant portion of the game.
[2] Our rating, 6.82, was also very poor and represented some less than a D.
[3] There were 13 players deemed worthy enough to get a mention. That is actually quite good, but probably represents the 2nd half better than the first.

Votes:
Kreuzer, Matthew 267
Curnow, Charles 229
Wright, Matthew 99
Docherty, Sam 93
Petrevski - Seton, Sam 93
Jones, Liam 87
Murphy, Marc 74
McKay, Harrison 25
Fisher, Zac 19
Kerridge, Sam 12
Graham, Nick 12
Simpson, Kade 6
Williamson, Tom 6

Progressive Voting:
3414 - Kreuzer, Matthew (0)
2638 - Docherty, Sam (0)
2613 - Murphy, Marc (0)
2185 - Gibbs, Bryce (0)
1615 - Cripps, Patrick (0)
886 - Curnow, Charles (0)
842 - Jones, Liam (0)
822 - Simpson, Kade (0)
689 - Plowman, Lachlan (0)
675 - Wright, Matthew (0)
663 - Curnow, Edward (0)
532 - Casboult, Levi (0)
432 - Marchbank, Caleb (0)
405 - Rowe, Sam (0)
401 - Silvagni, Alex (0)
396 - Petrevski - Seton, Sam (0)
302 - Silvagni, Jack (0)
241 - Kerridge, Sam (0)
155 - Weitering, Jacob (0)
116 - Thomas, Dale (0)
108 - Williamson, Tom (0)
80 - Cuningham, David (0)
79 - White, Simon (0)
69 - Graham, Nick (0)
57 - Fisher, Zac (0)
27 - Macreadie, Harrison (0)
25 - McKay, Harrison (0)
3 - Lamb, Jed (0)
3 - Boekhorst, Blaine (0)
3 - Pickett, Jarrod (0)

Matthew Kreuzer is a comfortable 700+ votes ahead of the pack, with Docherty and Murphy only a few votes apart in 2nd and 3rd places.
Gibbs is a distinct 4th and Cripps is a distinct 5th. The rest follow considerably behind.
Live Long and Prosper!
Reply


Messages In This Thread
2017 Jim Park Medal Analysis: - by crashlander - 03-21-2017, 09:55 AM
Re: 2017 Jim Park Medal Analysis: - by flyboy77 - 04-17-2017, 08:54 AM
Re: 2017 Jim Park Medal Analysis: - by flyboy77 - 04-18-2017, 06:57 AM
Re: 2017 Jim Park Medal Analysis: - by flyboy77 - 04-18-2017, 11:48 AM
Re: 2017 Jim Park Medal Analysis: - by flyboy77 - 04-18-2017, 09:30 PM
Re: 2017 Jim Park Medal Analysis: - by Thryleon - 04-18-2017, 11:42 PM
Re: 2017 Jim Park Medal Analysis: - by flyboy77 - 04-19-2017, 05:32 AM
Re: 2017 Jim Park Medal Analysis: - by DJC - 04-19-2017, 07:17 AM
Re: 2017 Jim Park Medal Analysis: - by Thryleon - 04-19-2017, 07:40 AM
Re: 2017 Jim Park Medal Analysis: - by Navy Maven - 04-26-2017, 05:46 AM
Re: 2017 Jim Park Medal Analysis: - by pinot - 05-15-2017, 09:17 AM
Re: 2017 Jim Park Medal Analysis: - by flyboy77 - 05-15-2017, 09:21 AM
Re: 2017 Jim Park Medal Analysis: - by LP - 06-07-2017, 03:03 AM
Re: 2017 Jim Park Medal Analysis: - by crashlander - 08-03-2017, 03:08 AM
Re: 2017 Jim Park Medal Analysis: - by Tragic - 09-11-2017, 09:26 PM
Re: 2017 Jim Park Medal Analysis: - by PaulP - 09-12-2017, 06:56 AM
Re: 2017 Jim Park Medal Analysis: - by DJC - 09-12-2017, 07:50 AM
Re: 2017 Jim Park Medal Analysis: - by Lods - 09-12-2017, 07:57 AM
Re: 2017 Jim Park Medal Analysis: - by PaulP - 09-12-2017, 08:20 AM
Re: 2017 Jim Park Medal Analysis: - by LoveNavy - 09-12-2017, 11:40 AM
Re: 2017 Jim Park Medal Analysis: - by flyboy77 - 09-12-2017, 01:08 PM
Re: 2017 Jim Park Medal Analysis: - by dodge - 09-12-2017, 01:15 PM
Re: 2017 Jim Park Medal Analysis: - by flyboy77 - 09-12-2017, 08:37 PM
Re: 2017 Jim Park Medal Analysis: - by madbluboy - 09-12-2017, 09:32 PM
Re: 2017 Jim Park Medal Analysis: - by Lods - 09-12-2017, 10:31 PM
Re: 2017 Jim Park Medal Analysis: - by maxm68 - 09-24-2017, 10:40 PM
Re: 2017 Jim Park Medal Analysis: - by DJC - 09-25-2017, 09:02 AM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)