07-31-2017, 08:38 AM
Richard Hinds has written a very good article outlining why there should be more concern about Kreuzer's concussion than Dangerfield's Brownlow hopes. I have posted an extract below:
The bleating on Geelong radio after the one match suspension was announced is unbearable >
Quote:... This should be apparent to those in the jockocracy who leapt to Dangerfield's defence. Surely, more than anyone, ex-players now appreciate the potential long-term consequences of the damage suffered by Kreuzer.
That should be apparent even to Geelong coach Chris Scott, who virtually demanded Dangerfield be cleared.
Although anyone who has regularly observed Scott and his twin, Brad, in the coach's box knows that what makes them identical is not their appearance. It is that neither has ever seen a justifiable free kick paid against their teams.
Most reprehensible were those who thought first of the impact of Dangerfield's potential suspension on the Brownlow Medal — and, even more ghastly, Brownlow Medal betting — than the precedent a "not guilty" finding would create ...
http://www.abc.net.au/news/2017-07-31/ma...tion=sport
The bleating on Geelong radio after the one match suspension was announced is unbearable >
“Why don’t you knock it off with them negative waves? Why don’t you dig how beautiful it is out here? Why don’t you say something righteous and hopeful for a change?” Oddball