(07-25-2017, 10:31 PM)Micky0 link Wrote:Maybe.
However most of Murphys possessions when he was clear, were ineffectual.
That is a confusion of cause and effect, if Cripps and Curnow were playing Murphy and Gibbs become effective at making space and becoming viable targets which then frees up others. The lack of depth has a ripple effect right across the field, it's easier to sit on a limited available number of stars, therefore it's easier to cover their potential targets even if they win the ball.
"Ruck, ruck, ruck, ruck ....... Ruck, ruck, ruck, ruck"