07-20-2017, 01:35 AM
(07-20-2017, 01:33 AM)Professer E link Wrote:Any scientist worth their salt publishes the uncertainty estimates, it's a key part of geochronolgy, or other quantitative technique for that matter.
C14 dating is unreliable post about 45 k due to the half lives of the radiogenic system. After that time the there isn't enough to measure... Analytical uncertainty exceeds instrumental precision.
yeah, the +/- numbers (error range) is always useful - unless you're a climate scientist!
Finals, then 4 in a row!

