07-21-2016, 10:18 AM
I would have kept him in, but I'm also not going to loose any sleep over it. He was poor. Graham also got dropped after comming in for the Brisbane game.
|
Rd 18: Pre Game Polite Discourse: Carlton vs Sydney
|
|
07-21-2016, 10:18 AM
I would have kept him in, but I'm also not going to loose any sleep over it. He was poor. Graham also got dropped after comming in for the Brisbane game.
07-21-2016, 10:24 AM
(07-21-2016, 10:18 AM)Bear link Wrote:I would have kept him in, but I'm also not going to loose any sleep over it. He was poor. Graham also got dropped after comming in for the Brisbane game. Perhaps there's a "have an impact or go back to the NBs" policy; and there's nothing wrong with that.
“Why don’t you knock it off with them negative waves? Why don’t you dig how beautiful it is out here? Why don’t you say something righteous and hopeful for a change?” Oddball
07-21-2016, 10:32 AM
Our defence will get plenty of practice this week with the ball pelting in. We have been pretty good at cutting off the ball this year. Problem is gong the other way. Our midfield is slow and weak, and Boekhorst is not the answer without others that can link up. I struggle to see us having an answer to the wave of runners that will surge forward. Could almost see white getting a defensive role on kennedy as curnow is the only player to limit hannebery.
The omission of Jacksh is odd. He was poor, but so were a few others. If his papers are stamped then what is one game going to change? Or is there the view that he is coming along well and the one game was just part of his development? Frankly, i would rather casboult stay in the seconds for a week or two with an expectation that he dominates. Unless he can sort his kicking quick smart then his days are pretty numbered as well. He is 26. Jacksh is 21.
07-21-2016, 11:18 AM
(07-21-2016, 10:01 AM)kruddler link Wrote:If that is truely the case, then i expect him to be delisted at the end of the year. Exactly. Couldn't have put that better. Needed another crack maybe in defence this time.
07-21-2016, 11:31 AM
(07-21-2016, 11:18 AM)laj link Wrote:Exactly. Couldn't have put that better. Needed another crack maybe in defence this time. He might have needed another crack but he didn't deserve one. Mind you, I'd have Sumner running around in the NBs too.
“Why don’t you knock it off with them negative waves? Why don’t you dig how beautiful it is out here? Why don’t you say something righteous and hopeful for a change?” Oddball
07-21-2016, 11:53 AM
(This post was last modified: 07-21-2016, 10:14 PM by ElwoodBlues1.)
(07-21-2016, 09:21 AM)crashlander link Wrote:Remarkably little chatter on this thread this week. Is that a commentary about how people think we will fare? I have no idea. But other weeks and other opponents have sparked considerably more traffic. I was impressed with Naismith last week...big unit but mobile with some skills....Sinclair towelled us last time especially playing down forward.... Dissapointed to see Jaksch dropped...dont see the logic, however I wouldnt be surprised to see him in and Wetiering out injured.... Boekhorst for Lamb is fair enough and the Swans will test Boekhorst's ability to win some contested ball.....dont want to see him put the handbrake on either and pull out of contests when there is some heat on him physically...
07-21-2016, 02:04 PM
(07-21-2016, 09:27 AM)laj link Wrote:Doubt he's going anywhere given he's contracted for next year plus we used pick 7 to get him. He's does have issues with his attitude off field, keen on a drink, not as keen on training, from what i hear, so that's one aspect he'd want to pick up. He played good footy in the VFL so we know he can play. If all of the above is right then he can be good if he applies himself. Up to him. I must have missed that game.
07-21-2016, 02:14 PM
(07-21-2016, 02:04 PM)RiverRat link Wrote:I must have missed that game. You've obviously seen plenty of him in the reserves, from your observations, do you believe he is capable of making it in senior footy or is it a completely lost cause ??
[size=8pt]"The Other Teams Can Rot In Hell"
07-21-2016, 07:50 PM
(07-21-2016, 10:08 AM)Gointocarlton link Wrote:In a nutshell. Agreed, we don't have anything to lose by playing him for another game or 2. Having said that i will back BB's judgement over my own. Glad to see Boekhorst back in as well. Along with Armfield, Buckley and Sumner we couldn't possibly play a quicker side which is something we have lacked recently. Going to be a nice sunny day in Sydney tomorrow so hopefully a bit of leg speed helps. Like someone said earlier, im also expecting us to be well beaten by the Swan midfield and Buddy. Hoping for more improvement from the youngsters
07-21-2016, 10:38 PM
(07-21-2016, 08:53 AM)Gointocarlton link Wrote:KJ papers appear stamped then. Whilst he didn't set the world on fire, I thought he would have been given one more go. We're playing Sydney, gonna get pumped anyway. What's there to lose? I'd like to offer an alternate view. If they had kept him in the side it may have been to give him a chance to save his career or be used as potential trade bait. By dropping him the message may be to pull your socks up, EARN a game and have a massive pre season. Won't really know but either way I think at this stage of the season he could have been afforded one more game. |
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|