Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Jim Park Voting; Round 1: Carlton vs Richmond
#41
(03-26-2016, 07:52 AM)DJC link Wrote:I really don't care what rating you give the team.  I happen to believe that losing is unacceptable and, while I may go to a C for a hard fought loss, that's my limit.

What's a 10 goal win worth, A++++++?  How about about a 20 goal win in a grand final?

We could debate this ad nauseum, not to mention folk who refuse to give Gibbs votes, but that's not the purpose of this thread.  We all have our own way of voting and rating teams, it's subjective, and there's no right or wrong way and nothing to gain by arguing about it.

Not far below my B- maximum. When you're a poor team though playing a finals team some losses are "more acceptable" than others, without at all being accepted as that will turn you into a $hit team quick smart. If we lost to Hawthorn by a point I could push to a B. If we lost to Essendon by a point we'd get a Z. Hence I use the word "context" before as not one size fits all. A 20 goal grand final win? Think I would just lose the whole load...lol.
#42
(03-26-2016, 07:52 AM)DJC link Wrote:I really don't care what rating you give the team.  I happen to believe that losing is unacceptable and, while I may go to a C for a hard fought loss, that's my limit.

What's a 10 goal win worth, A++++++?  How about about a 20 goal win in a grand final?

We could debate this ad nauseum, not to mention folk who refuse to give Gibbs votes, but that's not the purpose of this thread.  We all have our own way of voting and rating teams, it's subjective, and there's no right or wrong way and nothing to gain by arguing about it.

x2...I thought this thread was for votes only ...not to critique and ridicule others because they saw the game different...
#43
I suppose if we are ridiculing then our club isn't travelling too badly.

"everything you know is wrong"

Paul Hewson
#44
I'm only an observer of this thread so pardon my comment but if you disagree on the criteria what's the point of arguing about the ratings?  ???
Reality always wins in the end.
#45
3 - Gibbs
3 - Murphy
3 - Cripps
2 - Simpson
2 - Graham
2 - Docherty

Team B-
"Ruck, ruck, ruck, ruck ....... Ruck, ruck, ruck, ruck"
#46
Gibbs was sensational on Friday night as was the soft poor leader in Murphy.

It's easiest just to shake your head at these Muppets that will always find something to criticize a player like Gibbs.  Yeah he is never going to play like Mark Ricciuto but neither did/or do a lot of great players

                                                                                       
#47
Team C
Murphy 4
Cripps 3
Gibbs 3
Kruez 2
Phillips 1
Walker 1
Weitering 1

HM Doc, Simpson, 2E, Rowe



Coming together is the beginning.
Keeping together is progress.
Working together is success.
Henry Ford.
#48
Team - C

5 - Murphy
4 - Gibbs
3 - Cripps
2 - Simpson
1 - Doherty
#49
(03-26-2016, 08:29 AM)laj link Wrote:Not far below my B- maximum. When you're a poor team though playing a finals team some losses are "more acceptable" than others, without at all being accepted as that will turn you into a $hit team quick smart. If we lost to Hawthorn by a point I could push to a B. If we lost to Essendon by a point we'd get a Z. Hence I use the word "context" before as not one size fits all. A 20 goal grand final win? Think I would just lose the whole load...lol.

Well said. Likewise, B- is my maximum losing grading.

But maybe, like others have suggested, this particular topic should be for ratings etc only and not questioning the validity of another's rationale. Just thoughts...
Only our ruthless best, from Board to bootstudders will get us no. 17
#50
Team C
5 Murphy
4 Gibbs
3 Cripps
2 Simpson
1 Wright


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)