Jim Park Voting; Round 1: Carlton vs Richmond

[No1inParticular]

Team B+
Better team effort & game plan than any other over the last two years by a mile.

3 - Murphy
2 - Cripps
2 - Gibbs
1 - Kerridge
1 - Wright
1 - Graham
1 - Docherty
1 - Simpson
1 - Casboult
1 - Kreuzer
1 - Weitering

[shawny]

Team B

Cripps 4
Murphy 4
Simpson 2
Kerringe 1
Kruezer 1
Gibbs 1
Weitering 1
Docherty 1

[No1inParticular]

Everyone is rating Gibb's game, but I didn't see it that way.
He was still tooooo cruzey and didn't put his body on the line and seemed like he was just after the easy balls.
He needs to play with a harder more aggressive edge for my liking.
For a player of his ilk, he floats in and out of games too often and doesn't demand the footy.
Need better from him and I think we always will want better. Will never achieve the highs we expect of him for a no.1 pick. For a pick 55 he played well.

Cruzey, didn't put his body on the line.
7 tackles begs to differ.
And he only looked cruzey because he ran his arse off to get time & space.

[Blue Moon]

Team - B-

Murphy - 3
Cripps - 3
Gibbs - 3
Docherty - 2
Simpson - 2
Kreuzer - 1
Weitering - 1

[DJC]

Serious?

Yes, we played three quarters and didn't win.

[BluePhantom]

Cruzey, didn't put his body on the line.
7 tackles begs to differ.
And he only looked cruzey because he ran his arse off to get time & space.

Never said he didn't do anything, I said he needed to more and more often. :o

[PassIt2Carrots]

Never said he didn't do anything, I said he needed to more and more often. :o

He was extremely soft on numerous occasions. No passengers.

5 - Cripps

5 - Murphy

3 - Weitering

2 - Graham

[ElwoodBlues1]

Team D

6: Murphy
4: Cripps
2: Simpson
1: Weitering
1: Wright
1: Docherty

[Brettie]

People rating the performance with a 'D'.......FMD, are you serious? Based on that, I'm guessing a win would only rate maybe a 'B' at best?

Staggering appraisal and more than a tad absurd to be honest.

[ElwoodBlues1]

People rating the performance with a 'D'.......FMD, are you serious? Based on that, I'm guessing a win would only rate maybe a 'B' at best?

Staggering appraisal and more than a tad absurd to be honest.

I am serious and I dont see its as absurd..I usually rate a loss as a E.......I understand most would see last night as a honorable loss but I was disappointed as I see the Tigers as crap
and thought we should have won the game.
I am not about to give bouquet's to a team that misses easy goals that had the same players making the same mistakes when it counted......the difference from E to D was based around the excellent game from the likes of Weitering etc , continued great form of Cripps and handy contrubutions from newbies like Kerrdge, Wright, Philips...plenty to like but at the end we got knocked over by the likes of Lambert, Lloyd etc...you happy with that and want to give A+ for losing to the Tigers 3rd string players?