Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Daisy charged for striking Laidler! - can accept 1 game suspension
(03-18-2016, 04:45 AM)LP link Wrote:You are the one who made the assertion that we didn't take advice in your statement below!

So I appreciate you are ignoring the advice reported at the time that Buttifant had told Malthouse that Daisy was capable of making a full recovery, you write it off as smuck advice, fair enough. But you are making an even greater assumption that independent medical advice about Daisy would have been negative.

You don't know, you are just guessing and throwing darts!

Dr Baresi advised McKay and MM  not to recruit Daisy after examining him. They did and Baresi resigned.
Reply
(03-18-2016, 05:35 AM)Jofo link Wrote:Dr Baresi advised McKay and MM  not to recruit Daisy after examining him. They did and Baresi resigned.

Whats your source of this information?
"Ruck, ruck, ruck, ruck ....... Ruck, ruck, ruck, ruck"
Reply
(03-18-2016, 05:40 AM)LP link Wrote:Whats your source of this information?

I can't say or my identity may become apparent.
Reply
(03-18-2016, 05:44 AM)Jofo link Wrote:I can't say or my identity may become apparent.

I see, so speculation then.

I'd assert that if the Carlton club doctor resigned because the club staff ignored advice regarding the recruitment of a player, and that ultimately turned bad, it would be all over the media.

Our club leaks like a sieve and there is nothing about this anywhere, but you are telling me two senior staff ignored a Doctor's advice and made a stand-alone decision, the doctor would not even have to say a word and our club would have leaked that like diarrhea! Wink
"Ruck, ruck, ruck, ruck ....... Ruck, ruck, ruck, ruck"
Reply
(03-18-2016, 05:48 AM)LP link Wrote:I see, so speculation then.

I'd assert that if the Carlton club doctor resigned because the club staff ignored advice regarding the recruitment of a player, and that ultimately turned bad, it would be all over the media.

Our club leaks like a sieve and there is nothing about this anywhere, but you are telling me two senior staff ignored a Doctor's advice and made a stand-alone decision, the doctor would not even have to say a word and our club would have leaked that like diarrhea! Wink

Nah cause it was Swann, the teflon CEO, everyone's best mate.
Ignorance is bliss.

ONWARDS AND UPWARDS!
Reply
(03-18-2016, 04:45 AM)LP link Wrote:You are the one who made the assertion that we didn't take advice in your statement below!

So I appreciate you are ignoring the advice reported at the time that Buttifant had told Malthouse that Daisy was capable of making a full recovery, you write it off as smuck advice, fair enough. But you are making an even greater assumption that independent medical advice about Daisy would have been negative.

You don't know, you are just guessing and throwing darts!

So you think Buttifant, who is not a medical doctor or a physiotherapist and has a pretty clear conflict in this scenario, should be the authority on injuries?
Reply
(03-18-2016, 01:47 AM)ItsOurTime link Wrote:We should have taken medical advice ahead of some schmuck's belief that he has the heart to work through the injury.

There's no point defending it, the only question is how McKay has survived it.

The same medical advise that said Judd was shot?

You win some, you lose some.

Just like when we recruited judd, we had to pay a hefty price to get him to jump ship. Not many players want to go to the bottom team.
Reply
(03-18-2016, 08:07 AM)kruddler link Wrote:You win some, you lose some.

That's an unacceptable excuse. The facts were there on the table, they were deliberately ignored. It wasn't a calculated risk, it was an abhorrent decision.
Ignorance is bliss.

ONWARDS AND UPWARDS!
Reply
(03-18-2016, 08:26 AM)PassIt2Carrots link Wrote:That's an unacceptable excuse. The facts were there on the table, they were deliberately ignored. It wasn't a calculated risk, it was an abhorrent decision.

In hindsight, it appears obvious.

Judd could've backfired more though.

Imagine if he was shot. We gave up Kennedy, pick 3 and pick 20 for him.

At least daisy came for free in terms of what we gave up.
....NO....we didn't give up a first round compo pick, we never had it!
Reply
(03-18-2016, 08:38 AM)kruddler link Wrote:In hindsight, it appears obvious.

Judd could've backfired more though.

Imagine if he was shot. We gave up Kennedy, pick 3 and pick 20 for him.

At least daisy came for free in terms of what we gave up.
....NO....we didn't give up a first round compo pick, we never had it!

Daisy was never a Judd. Daisy had not played decent football for 2 years. The two simply do not compare at all. IMO.
Ignorance is bliss.

ONWARDS AND UPWARDS!
Reply


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)