Posts: 12,204
Threads: 37
Joined: Jul 2013
Reputation:
0
(08-30-2023, 11:22 AM)kruddler link Wrote:Further to the above....
2023 - 275.206 - https://afltables.com/afl/stats/2023s.html
2022 - 268.208 - https://afltables.com/afl/stats/2022s.html
2021 - 250.201 - https://afltables.com/afl/stats/2021s.html
Not sure where you get your stats from, but AFLTABLES should be where you start.
(08-30-2023, 11:18 AM)kruddler link Wrote:I've got something that explains the difference. Human error.
https://afltables.com/afl/teams/carlton/season.html
2023 - 275.272.1922
2022 - 268.249.1857
2021 - 250.246.1746
I generally use AFL tables as a rule for historic purposes.
Thing is though, your stats contradict each other somewhat.
"everything you know is wrong"
Paul Hewson
Posts: 16,688
Threads: 248
Joined: Jul 2013
Reputation:
0
(08-30-2023, 11:18 AM)kruddler link Wrote:I've got something that explains the difference. Human error.
https://afltables.com/afl/teams/carlton/season.html
2023 - 275.272.1922
2022 - 268.249.1857
2021 - 250.246.1746
I used the figures from a different page - https://afltables.com/afl/stats/2023s.html - and they're wrong. I suspect those tables don't count rushed behinds : 
And I copied one number incorrectly :-[
“Why don’t you knock it off with them negative waves? Why don’t you dig how beautiful it is out here? Why don’t you say something righteous and hopeful for a change?” Oddball
Posts: 29,292
Threads: 289
Joined: Jul 2013
Reputation:
0
Readers can see why you need to be very careful using stats, it's all in the definition and you cannot assume anything, you can't even assume the terms used mean the same thing to you and whoever compiled the stats.
"Ruck, ruck, ruck, ruck ....... Ruck, ruck, ruck, ruck"
Posts: 5,437
Threads: 168
Joined: Dec 2019
Reputation:
0
Lot's of variables in discussing goalkicking accuracy.
.
You can kick 30 goals-30 behinds....and they will tell you it's bad kicking 
And it was on that day Rnd 2 1969 against Hawthorn
Because only one of those behinds was 'rushed' according to the tables ;D
(one dodgy, unskilled player in particular kicked 6-12) 
On the other hand we kicked 9-20 against GWS in Rnd 3 this year and 8 out of the 20 behinds were rushed.
Then there's the shots that miss everything :
Posts: 21,282
Threads: 288
Joined: Jul 2013
Reputation:
0
(08-30-2023, 10:57 PM)Thryleon link Wrote:I generally use AFL tables as a rule for historic purposes.
Thing is though, your stats contradict each other somewhat.
I didnt think i needed to spell it out, but apparantly i do.
First list was total goals and total behinds per year.
Second list was total goals and behinds kicked by us......that is, excluding rushed behinds. So can see how many rushed behinds there are.
There is no contradiction. Just misunderstanding.
Posts: 16,688
Threads: 248
Joined: Jul 2013
Reputation:
0
I just had a quick look at our 2022 and 2023 goalkickers:
2022 - Key forwards 126, Small/medium forwards 72, Midfielders 61, Rucks 4, Defenders 5
2023 - Key forwards 124, Small/medium forwards 101, Midfielders 63, Rucks 9, Defenders 9
The figures are a bit rubbery as players change roles and I've treated Silvagni as a key forward rather than a ruck, but the increased efficiency of our small and medium forwards was significant in 2023. Crippa's output dropped from 20 to 9 but his midfield teammates more than picked up the slack.
Our gameplan and personnel are very different to Collingwood's and that is reflected in their 2023 goal kicking breakdown:
Key forwards 88, Small/medium forwards 109, Midfielders 101, Rucks 32, Defenders 4
However, it would be great if we could get more of a contribution from our rucks and midfielders.
“Why don’t you knock it off with them negative waves? Why don’t you dig how beautiful it is out here? Why don’t you say something righteous and hopeful for a change?” Oddball
Posts: 18,852
Threads: 274
Joined: Jul 2013
Reputation:
0
(10-25-2023, 06:39 AM)DJC link Wrote:I just had a quick look at our 2022 and 2023 goalkickers:
2022 - Key forwards 126, Small/medium forwards 72, Midfielders 61, Rucks 4, Defenders 5
2023 - Key forwards 124, Small/medium forwards 101, Midfielders 63, Rucks 9, Defenders 9
The figures are a bit rubbery as players change roles and I've treated Silvagni as a key forward rather than a ruck, but the increased efficiency of our small and medium forwards was significant in 2023. Crippa's output dropped from 20 to 9 but his midfield teammates more than picked up the slack.
Our gameplan and personnel are very different to Collingwood's and that is reflected in their 2023 goal kicking breakdown:
Key forwards 88, Small/medium forwards 109, Midfielders 101, Rucks 32, Defenders 4
However, it would be great if we could get more of a contribution from our rucks and midfielders. Interesting, thanks for that DJ
2017-16th
2018-Wooden Spoon
2019-16th
2020-dare to dream? 11th is better than last I suppose
2021-Pi$$ or get off the pot
2022- Real Deal or more of the same? 0.6%
2023- "Raise the Standard" - M. Voss Another year wasted Bar Set
2024-Back to the drawing boardNo excuses, its time
Posts: 16,688
Threads: 248
Joined: Jul 2013
Reputation:
0
(10-25-2023, 09:24 AM)Gointocarlton link Wrote:Interesting, thanks for that DJ
What those figures do show is that our forwards - tall, medium and small - are the least of our worries.
“Why don’t you knock it off with them negative waves? Why don’t you dig how beautiful it is out here? Why don’t you say something righteous and hopeful for a change?” Oddball
Posts: 12,204
Threads: 37
Joined: Jul 2013
Reputation:
0
I dont think we have too many worries.
The challenge for us isn't about ability anymore, it's about consistency and continuity. If we can get a decent run with injuries this season, we'll give the flag a red hot shake.
"everything you know is wrong"
Paul Hewson
Posts: 16,688
Threads: 248
Joined: Jul 2013
Reputation:
0
(10-25-2023, 11:40 AM)Thryleon link Wrote:I dont think we have too many worries.
The challenge for us isn't about ability anymore, it's about consistency and continuity. If we can get a decent run with injuries this season, we'll give the flag a red hot shake.
Yes, that’s true Thry.
A greater contribution from our mids and rucks would make life easier for our forwards though.
Adding Schultz or Papley to our list wouldn’t address a deficiency.
“Why don’t you knock it off with them negative waves? Why don’t you dig how beautiful it is out here? Why don’t you say something righteous and hopeful for a change?” Oddball
|
