Posts: 12,204
Threads: 37
Joined: Jul 2013
Reputation:
0
(04-23-2023, 08:54 AM)ElwoodBlues1 link Wrote:Either did Fisher, Durdin was his opponent who never went near him all day and let him get three inside 50s of which two ended up being goals. He also put his body on the line when Charlie came through in a marking contest, we didnt see that from any of our small forwards....
All of them were terrible. Mitch Robinson when he was sacked was at least a 25 to 30 odd tough nut with odd brain fade.
Stocker is an also ran. It's like pining about jed lamb.
"everything you know is wrong"
Paul Hewson
Posts: 12,204
Threads: 37
Joined: Jul 2013
Reputation:
0
(04-23-2023, 09:30 AM)Mav link Wrote:Did he? I saw no evidence that he was on Durdin. Or should I say that I saw no evidence that Durdin was on him as you seem to think small forwards are taggers. I’ve always thought defenders were supposed to tag forwards.
The only guy I saw running with Durdin was Wanganeen-Milleara.
If Stocker really was on Durdin, then he’ll be dropped next week. The goal Durdin scored occurred when Durdin ran into F50 to the left of the marking contest on the left flank and Stocker was pretty much in front of goals. They were separated by about 30 metres and indeed Durdin ran his full measure and kicked over Stocker who wasn’t close enough to spoil the shot. Losing your forward by that much if you’re supposed to be playing man-on-man would be unforgivable in Lyon’s eyes.
The Saints play Port next and it’ll be interesting to see if he is given the responsibility of stopping Rankine or Rachele. I doubt it. As the Saints get players back, Stocker will be thanked for his service and sent back to help out the VFL team.
rankine and Rachel play for the crows not port
"everything you know is wrong"
Paul Hewson