Posts: 3,970
Threads: 56
Joined: Jul 2013
Reputation:
0
Or maybe you could say Mme Curie unfortunately was at the cutting edge of new rather than mature technology. Nuclear power is now very mature whereas renewables and battery technologies will improve rapidly. Confining the comparison of nuclear and fossil fuel energy generation to only existing renewables & battery technology is misleading.
Posts: 12,204
Threads: 37
Joined: Jul 2013
Reputation:
0
Batteries still have a very real issue. They need to be charged.
Oh by the way, they've found a way to make nuclear waste into batteries.
"everything you know is wrong"
Paul Hewson
Posts: 3,970
Threads: 56
Joined: Jul 2013
Reputation:
0
And it only took them 70 years to do it. Imagine how much better (and how recyclable) non-nuclear batteries will be in the year 2060 ...
Posts: 29,292
Threads: 289
Joined: Jul 2013
Reputation:
0
None of the above addresses the fundamental problems, batteries all degrade over time then must be dealt with somehow, as do solar PV, as do catalysts in fuel cells. None of them are currently recycled, at the moment the nascent art of recycling is a dream.
Most of those pushing for these types of renewable energy would seem to have a conflict, and willfully ignore the filthy nature of the consuming solution they push. It is the same old filthy consumption model that Henry Ford marketed, rows and rows of panels and battery packets all mass produced assembled and sold for the consumers guilt free green pleasure. Just don't look under the mat!
"Ruck, ruck, ruck, ruck ....... Ruck, ruck, ruck, ruck"
Posts: 4,170
Threads: 84
Joined: Mar 2018
Reputation:
0
Still waiting for steggall to switch over to an ev like she promised.