CV and mad panic behaviour

[ElwoodBlues1]

EB the TGA website link you put up was quite specific about who should not have AZ. I was unlucky enough to have one of those specific conditions.

GTC, I'm taking about advertising for the average man on the street that appears on the TV etc...get the jab do it for the country etc etc...there has been no mention of the TGA. More people would know what the TAB  was for more than what the Theraputic Goods Association do. How many people getting the jab actually consulted their GP but just booked in trusting what the health officials, Eddie McGuire, Scotty Cam etc etc were saying?

[Gointocarlton]

GTC, I'm taking about advertising for the average man on the street that appears on the TV etc...get the jab do it for the country etc etc...there has been no mention of the TGA. More people would know what the TAB  was for more than what the Theraputic Goods Association do. How many people getting the jab actually consulted their GP but just booked in trusting what the health officials, Eddie McGuire, Scotty Cam etc etc were saying?

Fair points

[kruddler]

I think this is what you guys are talking about....

[ElwoodBlues1]

Those are some very powerful stats that the Government wont be including in any of their vaccine advertising.....

[DJC]

I think this is what you guys are talking about....

And only one of the 210 deaths is actually linked to vaccination  :

That's one of the reasons why we are lagging behind with our vaccination rollout (the Government's penny pinching is the main reason).  People accept erroneous statistics without bothering to check for themselves.

[LP]

Those are some very powerful stats that the Government wont be including in any of their vaccine advertising.....

That because they are fake, a image published by anti-vaxxer on FB or Instagram as shown by the URL.

://scontent.fmel12-1.fna.fbcdn.net/v/t1.6435-9/191680922_1159971614485863_5925834372433939655_n.jpg?_nc_cat=101&ccb=1-3&_nc_sid=dbeb18&_nc_ohc=VT5pHvzOZL8AX93jIMY&_nc_ht=scontent.fmel12-1.fna&oh=1b297b2f49007a11aaec2c285704f678&oe=60DC5551
FBCDN.net = FaceBook Content Delivery Network

There are not and were not 210 deaths "Caused by getting the vaccines", no authority has published that or posted it.

The were 210 people who died sometime after getting a vaccination, but that poster is like saying there are 210 people who died after eating breakfast. It's not a causal relationship, it's correlation.

[PaulP]

............................................................................

There are not and were not 210 deaths "Caused by getting the vaccines", no authority has published that or posted it.

The were 210 people who died sometime after getting a vaccination, but that poster is like saying there are 210 people who died after eating breakfast. It's not a causal relationship, it's correlation.

They are being mischievous and dishonest with how they report the data. If you go to the actual URL :

https://www.tga.gov.au/periodic/covid-19...27-05-2021

and read through it, it clearly provides a context for the death numbers, especially in the section entitled : Reports of death following vaccination, particularly in the elderly

I note that 109 deaths have been reported for the Pfizer, and "only" 94 for the AZ. But i thought the Pfizer was the best thing since sliced bread ?

[Professer E]

Looks like we'll be dealing with a nasty bird 'flu as well.

[Thryleon]

They are being mischievous and dishonest with how they report the data. If you go to the actual URL :

https://www.tga.gov.au/periodic/covid-19...27-05-2021

and read through it, it clearly provides a context for the death numbers, especially in the section entitled : Reports of death following vaccination, particularly in the elderly

I note that 109 deaths have been reported for the Pfizer, and "only" 94 for the AZ. But i thought the Pfizer was the best thing since sliced bread ?

appreciate that but people would argue similar for deaths caused by covid so that argument is at best a nil all draw

[LP]

appreciate that but people would argue similar for deaths caused by covid so that argument is at best a nil all draw

No the officials wouldn't report COVID deaths using the same spin, that is your deliberate personal choice to publish a private perspective which clouds the reporting and not a reality of the statistics. I think what you did there either by accident or design is called muddying the waters!

The numbers are clear, unambiguous and definitive, many of the published opinions of them not so much! :o