Posts: 8,744
Threads: 1,219
Joined: Jul 2013
Reputation:
0
Voting is as usual: you have 15 votes to award pretty much as you will, with the following provisos:
[1] 15 votes in total, no more, no less.
[2] No more than 10 votes for any one player (even Cripps)
[3] Three players at least must get a mention.
[4] A grade for the game, A+ (what I want to see) to F-.
I hope we play the way we want to play, as I want to have difficulty casting votes. Because so many need a mention, this is.
Live Long and Prosper!
Posts: 897
Threads: 1
Joined: Jul 2014
Reputation:
0
Clearly a lot of disappointed people out there.
Team: E
5 Cripps
4. Walsh
3. McKay
2. Silvagni
1. Curnow.
Posts: 22,431
Threads: 102
Joined: Jul 2013
Reputation:
0
Team E:
6: Weitering
3: Jones
3: Cripps
1: Walsh
1: McKay
1: E. Curnow
Posts: 979
Threads: 5
Joined: Jul 2013
Reputation:
0
Team: B
5 Cripps
3. Walsh
2. McKay
2. Weitering
2. Curnow
1. Stocker (1st half)
Posts: 9,435
Threads: 67
Joined: Jul 2013
Reputation:
0
Curnow's last touch in the game was 6 minutes into the 3rd quarter. Then nada....
Finals, then 4 in a row!
Posts: 188
Threads: 1
Joined: Jul 2013
Reputation:
0
Team D.
5: Cripps
4: McKay
3: Walsh
2: Weitering
1: Jones
Posts: 29,292
Threads: 289
Joined: Jul 2013
Reputation:
0
Team C
5 - Cripps
4 - Walsh
3 - McKay
2 - Williams
1 - Newman
"Ruck, ruck, ruck, ruck ....... Ruck, ruck, ruck, ruck"
Posts: 1,627
Threads: 1
Joined: Jul 2013
Reputation:
0
Team D - ordinarily I'd give a 'C' but I am so over our capitulations.
5 - Cripps
4 - Walsh
3 - McKay
2 - Williams
1 - Silvagni
Posts: 4,170
Threads: 84
Joined: Mar 2018
Reputation:
0
Team D
4 - Cripps
3 - Walsh
3 - McKay
2 - Williams
2 - Betts
1 - Silvagni
Posts: 8,744
Threads: 1,219
Joined: Jul 2013
Reputation:
0
Team: C+
Yes, we lost. We capitulated. But for a lot of this game, we were pretty good.
I really hate how it turned out, but there really were things we did well for long periods.
Votes:
[3] Patrick Cripps
[2.5] Sam Walsh
[2] Harry McKay
[1.5] Jacob Weitering
[1] Sam Docherty
[1] Eddie Betts
[1] Ed Curnow
[1] Nick Newman
[0.5] Liam Stocker
[0.5] Zac Williams
[0.5] Marc Pittonet
[0.5] Liam Jones
Explanations:
[3] Patrick Cripps: Crippa had a very good game and kept it going, even when we weren’t so good. Would have been worth more if his disposal was good as the way he got the ball.
[2.5] Sam Walsh: Vey solid game from Walsh, especially as he was a marked man.
[2] Harry McKay: Could have been a really big game had he been able to kick straight. Too good for his opponent.
[1.5] Jacob Weitering: Not as much attacking from Jacob, but a fine defensive effort.
[1] Sam Docherty: Not as good as he has been of late, but better than he was few weeks ago at HBF.
[1] Eddie Betts: Not enough, but what he was memorable.
[1] Ed Curnow: Really good early but fell out of the game completely.
[1] Nick Newman: Not as good as he has been either, but he wasn’t that bad.
[0.5] Liam Stocker: Started very well ad looks to have a future.
[0.5] Zac Williams: not bad in defence, and his goal was a ripper.
[0.5] Marc Pittonet: Won the ruck duel but couldn’t provide the drive we were looking for.
[0.5] Liam Jones: To keep Franklin to 3 was a good effort.
Honourable Mentions:
Jack Silvagni: Jack didn’t get it enough, but he did try his guts out and his goal was excellent.
Tom de Koning: Signs of the future.
Live Long and Prosper!
