Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
CV and mad panic behaviour
(05-28-2021, 03:21 AM)Mav link Wrote:The neo-con obsession with eliminating “excess capacity” is the problem. Going back to 2018, there were no pandemics. Why the hell pay to maintain a highly-trained workforce just in case a pandemic breaks out? After all, we can just set up a response in a week or so if we need to.

When Obama handed over to Trump, his staff handed over a manual covering pandemic response but that apparently was thrown in the bin. They had 3 virologists embedded in the Chinese pandemic response system but Trump was able to save money by withdrawing 2 of them.

That's just orange man hate rubbish.

You're better than than Mav.
Finals, then 4 in a row!
Reply
(05-28-2021, 08:55 AM)flyboy77 link Wrote:https://trialsitenews.com/five-rcts-rece...rior-rcts/

So if it works so well why are they ignoring ivermectin?

I call BS on it being worthy of discussion.

A significant difference is greater than 10% for your own knowledge. 
"everything you know is wrong"

Paul Hewson
Reply
(05-28-2021, 09:01 AM)Thryleon link Wrote:So if it works so well why are they ignoring ivermectin?

I call BS on it being worthy of discussion.

A significant difference is greater than 10% for your own knowledge. 

Thanks for the condescension. Data assessment is my area of expertise...

Call BS as much as you want, but if like LP, you can't be bothered reading the studies, don't waste my time...

https://c19ivermectin.com/
Finals, then 4 in a row!
Reply
(05-28-2021, 08:56 AM)flyboy77 link Wrote:That's just orange man hate rubbish.

You're better than than Mav.
You don’t like facts. Seems right-wingers have a version of Hansard: if you realise the facts are embarrassing, you have the right to claim they never existed.
Reply
(05-28-2021, 09:30 AM)Mav link Wrote:You don’t like facts. Seems right-wingers have a version of Hansard: if you realise the facts are embarrassing, you have the right to claim they never existed.

I'm far from right wing you clown. but nice try.

Put up some substance rather than rhetoric....

Which facts don't I like?
Finals, then 4 in a row!
Reply
(05-28-2021, 09:36 AM)flyboy77 link Wrote:I'm far from right wing you clown. but nice try.

Put up some substance rather than rhetoric....

Which facts don't I like?
I’ll get you to do a bit of homework: list the (alleged) facts you claim were orange man rubbish and then I’ll tell you which you don’t like.
Reply
You're not even funny.

Let's switch back to the real world.

Days ago, a family in Warrnambool lost their 8yo son (by drowning) at a school camp. 400 odd km from Melbourne. Zero virus out there....

The government denied their request to have more than 10 people at the lad's funeral.

Meanwhile, builders keep building (in the hot spot here in the city), footy players keep playing footy, etc.

I have an 8yo son. Who just returned from his first camp.

GAGF. If you can't acknowledge all this BS is political.
Finals, then 4 in a row!
Reply
Could you imagine Mav's rants on here if Scomo or Abbott ordered  lockdowns like this?
2012 HAPPENED!!!!!!!
Reply
I think we read here the genuine variations in the capacity of some individuals to deal with life's variations, this lockdown being one of them. I feel sorry for them, but as I've written before nobody must allow their confused rhetoric to go unchallenged.

It's the confused rhetoric they broadcast that feeds the vaccine hesitancy by placing fears and doubts in the thoughts of otherwise reasonable people.

As for Ivermectin, it only works treating viral infections in a very small number of cases, and it has very little efficacy in prevention and no long term immunity is delivered to the recipient, and to achieve the short term a users must take tablets costing $10-$15 each weekly for a maximum course of four tablets over about a month. Ivermectin's manufacturer recommend a complex brew of complementary medicines to ensure a result in that treatment window. But they cannot stay on it because it brings toxic side effects that will eventually cause more harm than good to the long term user That is the huge flaw in the Ivermectin argument. Wrongly many claim a single tablet is needed once a year, but that is a confusion of a regime for treatment fungal skin infections when used in conjunction with corticoid steroids.

A $2 vaccine gives 70% efficacy after 14 days, that is about 300% improvement over using Ivermectin as a preventative even if users could stay on it at $10 - $15 per week.
"Ruck, ruck, ruck, ruck ....... Ruck, ruck, ruck, ruck"
Reply
I'm getting the Pfizer now that I can (now that 40+ can get it). Why would I have rushed to get an inferior vaccine like astra? Like everyone I work with we had to wait 2 weeks after our flu shot.

2012 HAPPENED!!!!!!!
Reply


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 19 Guest(s)