CV and mad panic behaviour

[Gointocarlton]

Well back to the lock down.

Yep, 6w from 11:59pm tomorrow, Melb metro and Mitchell Shire.

[capcom]

Interesting developments in our town.  Businesses are no longer exactly welcoming out of town tourists.  Seems like they learned from the last time when they blew in and took large quantities of stock ordered for the locals.   

[LP]

Interesting developments in our town.  Businesses are no longer exactly welcoming out of town tourists.  Seems like they learned from the last time when they blew in and took large quantities of stock ordered for the locals.

Good, these roaming parasites are actually part of the problem!

[Baggers]

Interesting developments in our town.  Businesses are no longer exactly welcoming out of town tourists.  Seems like they learned from the last time when they blew in and took large quantities of stock ordered for the locals.   

Likewise here. Suddenly, the holiday homes and AirB'nBs are filling up! Once the constabulary does a sweep of number plates over the next few days I expect a few to get their marching orders... along with a fine.

[flyboy77]

Any chance of referencing some peer review articles from non-predatory journals that aren't using fake or redundant researcher profiles?

Do you know what Open Access infers?

I suppose probably not, the audited journals are not going to risk their reputation allowing this rubbish to be self-published without peer review.

Nobody is going to seriously claim that HCQ is "the missing link" when it's given with a barrage of other drugs including other powerful antibiotics. Perhaps the circular referencing is a hint, it may be worthwhile spending some time reading up on correlation versus causation, and how much work is required to get from a correlation to a causation, the answers won't be available this year!

Ah, so you resort to ad hominem attack.

The play of the average intellect.

Missing link? wtf does that mean. Multiple observational studies in multiple independent jurisdictions have show the 'blend' to be extremely highly effective if given as an early stage treatment....and in the right dosages.

What, you reckon it's all made up?

Dispute the evidence not the non "peer review journal"...

Should I recount the Lancet's last lame effort to discredit HCQ?

Weak as piss LP. Put up of something of substance or STFU.

[flyboy77]

It's fine, it is relative to other diseases which is perfectly relevant.

As opposed to some the figures you've quoted below, like;Hmm, officially India report about 20K deaths from 700K cases, that 20/700 * 100 = 3%

The thing that is extraordinary about India is that it is not like Brazil, at least yet, the strongest drivers of COVID-19 deaths versus cases are socio-economic! Of course India, unlike yourself and Brazil, isn't in denial about COVID-19, India took it very very seriously right from the start.

CFRs are BS numbers, but no doubt you know that....

You think I made that up?

14 deaths per million. It's a piss in the wind to the other stuff they've faced through history.

https://www.worldometers.info/coronavirus/#countries

And the chart is BS by any metric - you can't simply omit a dozen or so of the top causes of death to make a point.

It's clear you have an agenda, so be it.

Thankfully, the data speaks for itself.

[LP]

CFRs are BS numbers, but no doubt you know that....

You think I made that up?

14 deaths per million. It's a piss in the wind to the other stuff they've faced through history.

https://www.worldometers.info/coronavirus/#countries

And the chart is BS by any metric - you can't simply omit a dozen or so of the top causes of death to make a point.

It's clear you have an agenda, so be it.

Thankfully, the data speaks for itself.

RUOK Flyboy?

The thing that is a bit disturbing is that you looked at the Flourish graph and immediately focused on millions of deaths that should be counted above COVID-19, that is if the chart had every possible means of death listed. Trivializing and discounting the thousands of people who have died from COVID-19 related complications, and even in our own town many more who may in light of the post restriction reckless behavior that is promoted by similar outlooks to your own!

You've constructed a disturbing and destructive model of reality that gets reinforced every time you read some questionable facts or dubious data relationship, while immediately disregarding the real figures and lives lost. The problems isn't the figures, COVID-19 isn't a conspiracy, it's a pandemic that is killing people and you should consider those with friends and family who have been harmed or perished before you trivialize it further.

[flyboy77]

RUOK Flyboy?

The thing that is a bit disturbing is that you looked at the Flourish graph and immediately focused on millions of deaths that should be counted above COVID-19, that is if the chart had every possible means of death listed. Trivializing and discounting the thousands of people who have died from COVID-19 related complications, and even in our own town many more who may in light of the post restriction reckless behavior that is promoted by similar outlooks to your own!

You've constructed a disturbing and destructive model of reality that gets reinforced every time you read some questionable facts or dubious data relationship, while immediately disregarding the real figures and lives lost. The problems isn't the figures, COVID-19 isn't a conspiracy, it's a pandemic that is killing people and you should consider those with friends and family who have been harmed or perished before you trivialize it further.

Is that your best LP?

I saw the chart and immediately knew it was a con job as it omitted (likely by design) a dozen or so of the leading causes of death annually.

I note you don't dispute or refute the full list of causes I posted.

Your pitch refutes the data. Hard data.

Are you really a scientist? Did you fail maths at school?

Plenty of things kill us, we don't stop 'life' as we know it....the play book is well known, a pity politics got in the way.

The US? COVID is a created crisis.... IL, MA, MI, NJ, NY, PA State governors made nursing homes accept sick folk = mass deaths. Huge numbers!

The balance of US States, COVID seldom broke CDC's epidemic threshold.....

COVID is a virus that we now know can be readily managed - and contained - well it would be, but for the folk with agendas, political or otherwise.

[LP]

I saw the chart and immediately knew it was a con job as it omitted (likely by design) a dozen or so of the leading causes of death annually.

Are you really a scientist? Did you fail maths at school?

I did learn some math, I think it was called subsets.

Lucky for the USA, eh?

Let see what your Worldometer source says about that non-epidemic threshold fake fact!
https://www.worldometers.info/coronavirus/#countries

Trump would probably even disown that one!

[flyboy77]

I did learn some math, I think it was called subsets.

Get a refresher.

No comment on the efficacy of the PCR test?

https://off-guardian.org/2020/06/27/covi...Bv16izuilI

or even this

https://www.cell.com/cell/fulltext/S0092...20)30610-3

or this

https://www.nicholaslewis.org/why-herd-i...n-thought/

ps you can't really believe the peer review process has any substance surely?

As for your alleged fake fact, try here....

https://coronavirusbellcurve.com/

get back to me.