Jim Park Voting Round #16 Carlton vs. Fremantle

[OuterBlues]

Team - D

5 - White
4 - Buckley
3 - Docherty
2 - Curnow
1 - Bell

[PassIt2Carrots]

Mainly. The arguments are supposed to be on the post game threads and the like. But comments do appear: I am the worst offender. But I feel I always need to explain my thinking. I don't mind if others justify their thoughts, but it does make things more difficult to correlate when you have to wade through a heap of arguments.

I think the comments alongside the votes are fine, more questioning the votes of others.

[DJC]

I think the comments alongside the votes are fine, more questioning the votes of others.

Isn't the Prof questioning the performance of those players that don't score votes rather than the performance of voters?

I'm still thinking about my votes.  Using the 5 4 3 2 1 system does throw up some issues  ???

[DJC]

Team: D

5 - Curnow
4 - Murphy
3 - Bell
2 - White
1 - Docherty

[crashlander]

Isn't the Prof questioning the performance of those players that don't score votes rather than the performance of voters?

I'm still thinking about my votes.  Using the 5 4 3 2 1 system does throw up some issues  ???

The 5 4 3 2 1 voting system is the easiest for my to enter, but I find that it doesn't give me an opportunity to give votes to as many players who may deserve a mention or to grade them sufficiently. But I am the extreme case. Others follow it rigidly: the other extreme.
I don't care as long as the votes add up.

[DJC]

The 5 4 3 2 1 voting system is the easiest for my to enter, but I find that it doesn't give me an opportunity to give votes to as many players who may deserve a mention or to grade them sufficiently. But I am the extreme case. Others follow it rigidly: the other extreme.
I don't care as long as the votes add up.

I used to apportion votes out to as many players as I thought worthy Crash but I changed to the 5 4 3 2 1 voting system several seasons ago.  I like the discipline of selecting five players even if it is a close thing between fifth, sixth and seventh best or the length of the straight between fourth and fifth.

I thought it would be easier to process too 

[sandsmere]

Team. C

5. White
4. Docherty
2. Curnow
2. Buckley
1. Murphy
1. Bell

[Baggers]

Team C-

3 - Buckley

3 - Docherty

2 - Curnow

2 - Murphy

2 - White

1 - Bell

1 - Kreuzer

1 - Tutt

[mork]

Team - D

5 - White
4 - Murphy
3 - Docherty
2 - Buckley
1 - Bell

[kruddler]

Team C
6 White
4 Buckley
3 Docherty
2 Murphy