Posts: 18,852
Threads: 274
Joined: Jul 2013
Reputation:
0
(04-28-2019, 03:13 AM)laj link Wrote:Sounds like we did well just to have "best players"...lol.
Good sign that Stocker was our best.
There was one passage of play in the highlights package that might have been a look into our future (hopefully). Stocker took it from a centre bounce and kicked it long to BSOS who marked strongly in front of goal. Dont know if he kicked it but the passage looked good.
2017-16th
2018-Wooden Spoon
2019-16th
2020-dare to dream? 11th is better than last I suppose
2021-Pi$$ or get off the pot
2022- Real Deal or more of the same? 0.6%
2023- "Raise the Standard" - M. Voss Another year wasted Bar Set
2024-Back to the drawing boardNo excuses, its time
Posts: 12,204
Threads: 37
Joined: Jul 2013
Reputation:
0
(04-28-2019, 03:54 AM)Gointocarlton link Wrote:There was one passage of play in the highlights package that might have been a look into our future (hopefully). Stocker took it from a centre bounce and kicked it long to BSOS who marked strongly in front of goal. Dont know if he kicked it but the passage looked good.
He scored a behind by shining it. Was a demanding kick from about 50 out so not surprising for a first year player.
Commentators were saying it was a shot of a defender.
Regarding our retreads I think sos has maximised the number of players we have gotten in for very little outlay and judging them solely by how they perform fails to take into account the bigger picture.
All of them have cost not much or been key to us trading in other useful picks for our real goals. Of the retreads only the lower risk higher rewards have really failed. The draft is where we are doing our real improvement and I'm ok with that. With a bit of luck we would have had a bit more success but you can only try. Fasolo had the potential to be a game winner but it hasn't panned out, and that's ok because it actually didn't cost us anything special.
"everything you know is wrong"
Paul Hewson
Posts: 8,503
Threads: 8
Joined: Jul 2013
Reputation:
0
Sorry, I ain't buying the argument "it's OK that they're crap because they cost nothing". Waste of time types, they getting us nowhere.
We paid decent draft picks for all these GWS types and I ain't seeing a lot of world beaters. I'd swap all these cheap half raters for one decent blow in. Quality trumps quantity.
DrE is no more... you ok with that harmonica man?
Posts: 12,204
Threads: 37
Joined: Jul 2013
Reputation:
0
(04-28-2019, 10:03 AM)Professer E link Wrote:Sorry, I ain't buying the argument "it's OK that they're crap because they cost nothing". Waste of time types, they getting us nowhere.
We paid decent draft picks for all these GWS types and I ain't seeing a lot of world beaters. I'd swap all these cheap half raters for one decent blow in. Quality trumps quantity.
What did we give up to get them?
Think carefully and tell me which ones haven't delivered value on their recruitment and tell me what the opportunity cost was?
"everything you know is wrong"
Paul Hewson
Posts: 4,608
Threads: 16
Joined: Jul 2013
Reputation:
0
Yeah - a spot on the list is so valuable. The trick is to minimise the flops.
Not easy though.
Posts: 9,435
Threads: 67
Joined: Jul 2013
Reputation:
0
04-28-2019, 10:58 AM
(This post was last modified: 04-28-2019, 12:32 PM by flyboy77.)
Blokes like Kennedy and Fasolo should not be played in the 2s when kids like O'Brien and Polson get games and do jack. Repeatedly.
Why pick up Fasolo and leave him to rot in the 2s....he was no worse than most others in our many losses.
Finals, then 4 in a row!
Posts: 2,416
Threads: 2
Joined: Jul 2018
Reputation:
0
I honestly thought we'd started to develop some depth but after reading that summary I'm not so sure. I commented last year that Lang was a spud and another Geelong cast-off that had burned us and nothing has changed to make me think anything different. Williamson will be an IN this week I think and possibly even Stocker if Newman doesn't come up. But apart from those two and maybe Macreadie, the rest makes for disappointing reading. Fasolo will struggle to get a game at the top level this year. I'd rather persist with Gibbons and Cunningham. Gibbons impresses me with his work rate up and down the ground and will only get better at the top level.
Posts: 29,292
Threads: 289
Joined: Jul 2013
Reputation:
0
Stocker is a good size compared to Williamson, get them fit and in form and the long term future is bright.
"Ruck, ruck, ruck, ruck ....... Ruck, ruck, ruck, ruck"