Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Post Game Parley-2019 AFL Rd 2: Carlton vs Port Adelaide:
#41
(03-30-2019, 10:15 AM)Barbs link Wrote:Looking at the stats sheet a few things stand out:

Port had 94 more disposals - mostly handballs though and pretty much all uncontested. I think that highlights our lack of running and linking up of half back.

Our efficiency inside 50 was slightly better than port’s, but we didn’t get it there enough

We got smashed in the hitouts, 58 to 32. Clearances were also 61-37 against us.

Our heat map again shows us stuck in the defensive half back line on one side of the ground for a lot of the game. We don’t move the ball well and get stuck here.

We had zero bounces. We don’t run and carry he ball enough.

Gibbons and Setterfield had the most pressure acts on the ground - 33 and 31, respectively. Polson had th same number as Philips and just one more than Murphy. Ed, Simpson and Garlett had just nine each. McKay had more.

Port are very quick but over use the footy and will probably win the uncontested stuff in every game they play....Lycett and Ryder were always going to wear down Philips, they are two bigger bodied types that doent suit Philips but I thought he battled on ok.
Clearances was a big issue today and was last season, having the best clearance player in the comp(Cripps) you dont expect this problem most weeks and would expect to break even, no Kreuzer doesnt help either..
The tactics or personnel have to change in the middle..not sure what assistant is doing the stoppages but I'd be asking questions if I was Bolton..
Pressure acts are great but only if they amount to something IMO....
Reply
#42
(03-30-2019, 10:08 AM)kruddler link Wrote:Nor will playing Fas.

Not sure why we're not playing SOSOS.
Reply
#43
I've got a position for Smurph,
Left right out!
2024... Moir of the same to come
Reply
#44
(03-30-2019, 10:36 AM)jeza link Wrote:Not sure why we're not playing SOSOS.

Reckon he might come in for Charlie and play down forward with McGovern and Harry.
Other choice I guess would be Kerr but I'd see Jack ahead of him in the pecking order....
Reply
#45
(03-30-2019, 10:33 AM)jeza link Wrote:Gray has cut us up in the past - next to no impact today. You can't shut everyone out of the game.
27 possessions, 5 tackles and a goal.
Wish our low impact players were contributing that much.
Reply
#46
(03-30-2019, 10:43 AM)ElwoodBlues1 link Wrote:Reckon he might come in for Charlie and play down forward with McGovern and Harry.
Other choice I guess would be Kerr but I'd see Jack ahead of him in the pecking order....

Gee, Levi has been forgotten quickly!!
Reply
#47
(03-30-2019, 10:59 AM)townsendcalling link Wrote:Gee, Levi has been forgotten quickly!!

Who?

"everything you know is wrong"

Paul Hewson
Reply
#48
Watching the tape....Garlett looks scared to take possession.  It's embarrassing.  As somebody else has already pointed out,  surely we can't pick this bloke again?

Weeters was massive today.  We saw it today,  he flogged Westhoff.

We need to get us some meat and potatoes, cannon fodder types around the ball.... Nothing fancy,  not high draft picks,  just plain and effective no frills types that are as mean as cat crap.  Must be more Powell Pepper (*) types running around the state leagues?

*im just using him as an example of a no frills straight runner.  We need some impact around the ball,  especially in wet conditions.
DrE is no more... you ok with that harmonica man?
Reply
#49
At least we aren't Melbourne.
"everything you know is wrong"

Paul Hewson
Reply
#50
To be fair Faz had 9 possessions, 2 marks and kicked a cheap goal cheating out the back that Ed Curnow passed it over the top to him. That's surely comparable?
Reply


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)