Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Dual citizens in Parliament
#11
(11-13-2017, 04:47 AM)dodge link Wrote:What a bunch of dills.

I think the term is crooks!
"Ruck, ruck, ruck, ruck ....... Ruck, ruck, ruck, ruck"
Reply
#12
Lods - can you imagine the campaign and who gets elected?  I really don't know now with so many unelected Senate members and the couple of by-elections.  Maybe it is a good chance to wipe the slate clean - although that was also meant to happen last time.  It is no wonder that Brexit, Trump etc get up.
Reply
#13
Whats the actual purpose of the rule? If am born and bred here, but have dual cit due to a parent, whats the big deal?
2017-16th
2018-Wooden Spoon
2019-16th
2020-dare to dream? 11th is better than last I suppose
2021-Pi$$ or get off the pot
2022- Real Deal or more of the same? 0.6%
2023- "Raise the Standard" - M. Voss Another year wasted Bar Set
2024-Back to the drawing boardNo excuses, its time
Reply
#14
(11-13-2017, 10:06 AM)dodge link Wrote:Lods - can you imagine the campaign and who gets elected?  I really don't know now with so many unelected Senate members and the couple of by-elections.  Maybe it is a good chance to wipe the slate clean - although that was also meant to happen last time.  It is no wonder that Brexit, Trump etc get up.

Before we did go to a full election we would have to make sure every candidate was legit
That in itself would be a bit of a task.

You have to wonder though.... until this problem became an issue how many people have sat in Parliament over the years and been dual citizens.
It's the constitution that needs to change.
On swearing in as a member of Parliament surely it just needs a statement along the lines of "I hereby relinquish any previous allegiances and citizenship and pledge that my loyalty is to Australia alone."
Reply
#15
(11-13-2017, 10:16 AM)Gointocarlton link Wrote:Whats the actual purpose of the rule? If am born and bred here, but have dual cit due to a parent, whats the big deal?

The purpose is to try to ensure that our elected representatives don't have allegiance to any other country.  I think that the requirement is eminently sensible and it shouldn't be hard for those who put their hands up for election to ensure that they have renounced any other citizenship.  If they can't manage that, they shouldn't be in parliament.

Of course, as we have seen recently, China has been able obtain allegiance from some parliamentarians by offering financial inducements, donations etc.  That should be a sackable offence too.
“Why don’t you knock it off with them negative waves? Why don’t you dig how beautiful it is out here? Why don’t you say something righteous and hopeful for a change?”  Oddball
Reply
#16
If your parents barracked for the Bummers would that make you a Bummer supporter by descent??  :o
Reality always wins in the end.
Reply
#17
(11-13-2017, 12:27 PM)cookie2 link Wrote:If your parents barracked for the Bummers would that make you a Bummer supporter by descent??  :o

Not this little Navy Blue duck, I renounced my alliegance a long time ago...
Mens sana in corpore sano - A healthy mind in a healthy body.

Navy, it's not just a color, it's an attitude !!!
Reply
#18
(11-13-2017, 01:02 PM)Amers link Wrote:Not this little Navy Blue duck, I renounced my alliegance a long time ago...

But did you get the official paperwork A?  Wink
Reality always wins in the end.
Reply
#19
Sarah Hanson Young cant be removed from parliament can she?...she has a double barrelled name is that close enough for dual citizenship......? Wink
Reply
#20
(11-13-2017, 01:02 PM)Amers link Wrote:Not this little Navy Blue duck, I renounced my alliegance a long time ago...

+1 dad was a bomber, mum was indifferent, but grandfather on that side was a Hawk.

I went straight to the Navy Blue!
"everything you know is wrong"

Paul Hewson
Reply


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)