Posts: 8,744
Threads: 1,219
Joined: Jul 2013
Reputation:
0
Remember:
[1] At least 3 players need to get a mention.
[2] No more than 10 votes for any one player.
[3] Give a rating of team performance. It can be anywhere from A+ to F.
[4] Votes must add up to 15.
I'll put my 2 cents in when I get back from the game.
Live Long and Prosper!
Posts: 419
Threads: 4
Joined: Jul 2013
Reputation:
0
Team D
5 Cripps
4 Kreuzer
3 Docherty
2 Gibbs
1 Casboult
Da Di Da Di Dar..Da Di Da Di Dar..Da Di Da Di Da Di Darrr ...Darrr Darr.. We are the NAVY BLUES !!
Posts: 1,786
Threads: 29
Joined: Jul 2013
Reputation:
0
Team D
Cripps: 5
Kreuzer: 5
C Curnow: 3
Casboult: 1
Jones: 1
Goals for 2017
=============
Play the most anti-social football in the AFL
![[Image: blueline.jpg]](http://www.carltonblues.net/images/blueline.jpg)
Posts: 9,435
Threads: 67
Joined: Jul 2013
Reputation:
0
They should get a Z on that effort.
Finals, then 4 in a row!
Posts: 9,435
Threads: 67
Joined: Jul 2013
Reputation:
0
that was truly diabolical...
Finals, then 4 in a row!
Posts: 12,204
Threads: 37
Joined: Jul 2013
Reputation:
0
Team E
Kreuzer 5
Docherty 4
Cripps 4
Jones 1
Curnow C 1
"everything you know is wrong"
Paul Hewson
Posts: 634
Threads: 0
Joined: Jul 2014
Reputation:
0
Team d
Kreuzer 4
Cripps 4
Docherty 3
Gibbs 2
C curnow 1
Murphy 1
Posts: 3,679
Threads: 278
Joined: Jul 2013
Reputation:
0
Team D
Kruezer 4
Docherty 4
Gibbs 2
Jones 2
Casboult 1
Charlie C 1
Simpson 1
Posts: 8,744
Threads: 1,219
Joined: Jul 2013
Reputation:
0
I just read that some of the scribes gave Dustin Martin BOG today. I wonder if they were at the game? I would have said not.
Team: D+
We lost by less than 5 goals to a team that considers itself a serious final’s candidate. I wonder if they are serious? But they did want it more than we did, which hurt a lot. We were so down compared to the last few weeks, but we didn’t give it up and, had Pickett done the right thing, we would have been less than 1 goal down. That incident killed us and it may well cost Pickett for some time to come.
Votes:
[3] Kreuzer
[3] Cripps
[3] Docherty
[1.5] Gibbs
[1] Jones
[1] Murphy
[1] Weitering
[0.5] Graham
[0.5] Thomas
[0.5] Charlie Curnow
Explanations:
[3] Kreuzer: Excellent in the ruck. Killed a good ruckman in Nankervis.
[3] Cripps: 10 clearances, some great marks, 1 goal and huge numbers of tackles. Cripps really put in.
[3] Docherty: Didn’t look 100%, but still did a fine job.
[1.5] Gibbs: Not quite as dominant as last week, but managed 30 possessions.
[1] Jones: Did a fine job in defence, but is still very much learning to be a senior defender.
[1] Murphy: Not as his best today, but he did run hard and work hard.
[1] Weitering: Like Jones, did everything that was asked of him.
[0.5] Graham: Did some very good things, but he isn’t a marking target.
[0.5] Thomas: Worked hard and went generally unrewarded for his efforts.
[0.5] Charlie Curnow: His marking was excellent.
Honourable Mentions:
Casboult: Could have been brilliant, as Richmond couldn’t contain him. But he just couldn’t get enough ball.
Wright: Worked hard
Ed Curnow: Did a good job until forced off the ground.
Live Long and Prosper!
Posts: 315
Threads: 1
Joined: Jul 2013
Reputation:
0
TEAM D- Back to the Carlton of old
5 Kreuzer
4 Cripps
3 Docherty
1 Jones
1 Gibbs
1 C Curnow
