+- Carlton Supporters Club (http://new.carltonsc.com)
+-- Forum: Lily Of Laguna (http://new.carltonsc.com/forum-5.html)
+--- Forum: Ladies Lounge (http://new.carltonsc.com/forum-19.html)
+--- Thread: Prespakis charged for tackle on Sarah Hosking - Appeal fails - 1 week suspension (/thread-5082.html)
Prespakis charged for tackle on Sarah Hosking - Appeal fails - 1 week suspension - kruddler - 02-22-2021
So its happened. It shouldn't of, but it has.
It has been graded as....
Careless
Medium Impact
High Contact.
She can take 1 week suspension with an early plea.
We have until 11am tomorrow to respond.
I'm not sure which angle we'd choose to attack, but considering Sarah Hosking was able to take her kick....and played out the game and would surely back up Maddie P in any tribunal meeting (They hugged after the game).....i don't know the charges can stick.
Re: Prespakis charged for tackle on Sarah Hosking. - kruddler - 02-22-2021
https://womens.afl/video/61731/is-reigning-aflw-best-and-fairest-in-trouble-for-this-tackle-
Re: Prespakis charged for tackle on Sarah Hosking. - rocky - 02-22-2021
She's in trouble. Take the week.
Re: Prespakis charged for tackle on Sarah Hosking. - LP - 02-22-2021
(02-22-2021, 07:41 AM)kruddler date Wrote:So its happened. It shouldn't of, but it has.If it the one the replayed over and over how can it be high contact, the side on slow motion from the 2nd angle showed Sarah's head didn't really hit the turf it was her shoulder!
It has been graded as....
Careless
Medium Impact
High Contact.
She can take 1 week suspension with an early plea.
We have until 11am tomorrow to respond.
I'm not sure which angle we'd choose to attack, but considering Sarah Hosking was able to take her kick....and played out the game and would surely back up Maddie P in any tribunal meeting (They hugged after the game).....i don't know the charges can stick.
Maybe it's another incident?
Re: Prespakis charged for tackle on Sarah Hosking. - Gointocarlton - 02-22-2021
Hosking came back on and wasn't concussed for what its worth.
Re: Prespakis charged for tackle on Sarah Hosking. - DJC - 02-22-2021
Fight it!
Any competent sports biomechanics analyst should be able to present a watertight case.
Re: Prespakis charged for tackle on Sarah Hosking. - kruddler - 02-22-2021
(02-22-2021, 09:10 AM)LP link Wrote:If it the one the replayed over and over how can it be high contact, the side on slow motion from the 2nd angle showed Sarah's head didn't really hit the turf it was her shoulder!
Maybe it's another incident?
I linked it above.
Re: Prespakis charged for tackle on Sarah Hosking. - kruddler - 02-22-2021
(02-22-2021, 09:39 AM)Gointocarlton link Wrote:Hosking came back on and wasn't concussed for what its worth.
Not only that, she jumped to her feet and took the kick. Played on for another 5 - 10 minutes before prespakis buried her in another tackle....which she jumped up from.....and THEN they gave her a concussion test
Re: Prespakis charged for tackle on Sarah Hosking. - LP - 02-22-2021
(02-22-2021, 11:27 AM)DJC date Wrote:Fight it!Yes, as a sport we can't have MRP matters being decided by commentators, the kid was prosecuted, judged and executed by the jerk behind the microphone.
Any competent sports biomechanics analyst should be able to present a watertight case.
Re: Prespakis charged for tackle on Sarah Hosking. - Professer E - 02-22-2021
More evidence that the AFL(W) is corrupt.