![]() |
|
2017 Round 4 : In Game thread - Carlton V Gold Coast - Printable Version +- Carlton Supporters Club (http://new.carltonsc.com) +-- Forum: Princes Park (http://new.carltonsc.com/forum-4.html) +--- Forum: Robert Heatley Stand (http://new.carltonsc.com/forum-14.html) +--- Thread: 2017 Round 4 : In Game thread - Carlton V Gold Coast (/thread-3219.html) |
2017 Round 4 : In Game thread - Carlton V Gold Coast - PaulP - 04-15-2017 Fasten your seat belts Ladies and Gents - tonight, we feel the need for speed. Re: 2017 Round 4 : In Game thread - Carlton V Gold Coast - LoveNavy - 04-15-2017 Excited to see more of the youngsters. Looking forward to your posts bluebaggers. My live pass has been playing up.. Go new Blues Re: 2017 Round 4 : In Game thread - Carlton V Gold Coast - shawny - 04-15-2017 At the game - Cripps doesn't look right. Went down the race and hasn't appeared. Any news? Re: 2017 Round 4 : In Game thread - Carlton V Gold Coast - LoveNavy - 04-15-2017 No mention on fox Re: 2017 Round 4 : In Game thread - Carlton V Gold Coast - Robblues - 04-15-2017 Evening all. Nice to see some pace from our debutant. We didn't get the result on the scoreboard but some positive stuff Re: 2017 Round 4 : In Game thread - Carlton V Gold Coast - maxm68 - 04-15-2017 Murphy is on fire again....... a lot of wasted opportunities we should be a couple in front. all in all not a bad start we just need to finish it off with more GOALS !! Re: 2017 Round 4 : In Game thread - Carlton V Gold Coast - shawny - 04-15-2017 Controlled most of the quarter 6 scoring shots to 3. Kids looking good again. Concerned about cripps. Re: 2017 Round 4 : In Game thread - Carlton V Gold Coast - Robblues - 04-15-2017 Simmo looks more like his old self tonight , would be a bonus if he can capture last years form Re: 2017 Round 4 : In Game thread - Carlton V Gold Coast - Robblues - 04-15-2017 Nice to see some desire form out guys , they came to play Re: 2017 Round 4 : In Game thread - Carlton V Gold Coast - Robblues - 04-15-2017 Cripps on the ground so must assume all is ok ? |