+- Carlton Supporters Club (http://new.carltonsc.com)
+-- Forum: Princes Park (http://new.carltonsc.com/forum-4.html)
+--- Forum: Robert Heatley Stand (http://new.carltonsc.com/forum-14.html)
+--- Thread: Rd 5: Jim Park Voting: Carlton vs. Fremantle (/thread-2670.html)
Rd 5: Jim Park Voting: Carlton vs. Fremantle - crashlander - 04-22-2016
2nd time lucky: my connection didn't quite manage to create this thread earlier today.
Nichevo.
To those who will be at the game live or have Pay TV, I envy you. I will have to fix that issue.
Hopefully there will be plenty of reasons to vote after this round!
Remember:
[1] At least 3 players need to get a mention.
[2] No more than 10 votes for any one player.
[3] Give a rating of team performance. It can be anywhere from A+ to F.
[4] Votes must add up to 15.
Re: Rd 5: Jim Park Voting: Carlton vs. Fremantle - crashlander - 04-24-2016
A bit surprised nobody has started this, but I am willing enough.
Team: B
We won. Can’t say anything else. Granted that we had our problems, especially by foot, but we won against one of the best teams of the last 5 years on their own patch.
Votes:
First a caveat: I didn’t see the game at all. I just followed it by the statistics. Therefore my opinions will not be as accurate as I would like, as I don’t know enough about the match – ups.
However:
[3] Cripps
[2] Kerridge
[1.5] Simpson
[1.5] Murphy
[1.5] Ed Curnow
[1.5] Gibbs
[1] Wright
[1] Byrne
[1] Thomas
[1] Rowe
Explanations:
[3] Cripps: 20 contested disposals and more clearances than anyone else.
[2] Kerridge: In and under and lots of the ball.
[1.5] Simpson: Disposal by hand was so so, but by foot was pretty good.
[1.5] Murphy: Brilliant early, and excellent after half time.
[1.5] Ed Curnow: Really stood up when it was required.
[1.5] Gibbs: Best effort for the year.
[1] Wright: Brilliant first half
[1] Byrne: Drive and run from defence.
[1] Thomas: Kicked 3 goals
[1] Rowe: Beat Pavlich
Honourable Mentions:
Kreuzer: Lots of taps, but not many possessions.
Phillips: Lots of taps, but struggled to get possessions.
Liam Jones: Not even God could have get a kick with some of our forward football, but he kicked 2 when it was really necessary.
Casboult: Much more comfortable away from the big sticks.
Re: Rd 5: Jim Park Voting: Carlton vs. Fremantle - jeza - 04-24-2016
3. Byrne (contested marks: 4 / rest of the team: 5 - Awesome)
2. Cripps (29 including 20 contested - 20! Ridiculous. Far from his best but he did wear around a freo player shaped backpack all day)
1. Simmo (30@ 87% efficiency + 3 goal assists - did some real damage - great to see)
Re: Rd 5: Jim Park Voting: Carlton vs. Fremantle - RiverRat - 04-24-2016
Team = B
[3] Simpson
[2] Wright
[2] Murphy
[1] Byrne
[1] Cripps
[1] Gibbs
[1] Rowe
[1] Thomas
[1] Gibbs
[1] Kerridge
[1] Ed Curnow
Re: Rd 5: Jim Park Voting: Carlton vs. Fremantle - LoveNavy - 04-24-2016
Team B-
Thomas 3
Byrne 3
Rowe 3
Simmo 2
Cripps 1
Murphy 1
Lamb 1
Kerridge 1
Re: Rd 5: Jim Park Voting: Carlton vs. Fremantle - ElwoodBlues1 - 04-24-2016
Team B+
4: Byrne
2: Thomas
2: Wright
2: Simpson
2: Murphy
1: Cripps
1: Rowe
1: Casboult
Re: Rd 5: Jim Park Voting: Carlton vs. Fremantle - Juddkreuzer - 04-24-2016
Team B
5 - Rowe
4 - Cripps
3 - Kerridge
2 - Murphy
.5 - Kreuzer
.5 - Thomas
Re: Rd 5: Jim Park Voting: Carlton vs. Fremantle - cimm1979 - 04-24-2016
Can't be bothered with the votes but Ed Curnow was our best from where I sat.
Cripps was immense, but Ed was everywhere we were weak.
This guy is an example setter.
Re: Rd 5: Jim Park Voting: Carlton vs. Fremantle - OuterBlues - 04-24-2016
Team - B
5 - Murphy
4 - Cripps
3 - Wright
2 - Simpson
1 - Byrne
Re: Rd 5: Jim Park Voting: Carlton vs. Fremantle - crashlander - 04-24-2016
(04-24-2016, 12:41 PM)jeza link Wrote:3. Byrne (contested marks: 4 / rest of the team: 5 - Awesome)Doesn't quite add up to 15 votes. Do you want me to award votes using ratios?
2. Cripps (29 including 20 contested - 20! Ridiculous. Far from his best but he did wear around a freo player shaped backpack all day)
1. Simmo (30@ 87% efficiency + 3 goal assists - did some real damage - great to see)