![]() |
|
General Discussions - Printable Version +- Carlton Supporters Club (http://new.carltonsc.com) +-- Forum: Social Club (http://new.carltonsc.com/forum-6.html) +--- Forum: Blah-Blah Bar (http://new.carltonsc.com/forum-23.html) +--- Thread: General Discussions (/thread-4803.html) Pages:
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
|
Re: General Discussions - Mav - 06-27-2022 Would a castrated Mitchell Starc who underwent a course of estrogen injections still bowl at 150 km/h? If the answer is yes, then why does WADA ban steroids and testosterone as PEDs? Re: General Discussions - Baggers - 06-27-2022 (06-27-2022, 08:23 AM)kruddler link Wrote:Ok, so what about those people who are born with both 'bits'? ...the TED talks on this topic are excellent. Good pick-up/point, K. Re: General Discussions - Thryleon - 06-27-2022 (06-27-2022, 08:23 AM)kruddler link Wrote:Ok, so what about those people who are born with both 'bits'? I have watched the talks. You can't throw a blanket over everyone but those people with both bits you mention aren't trans or don't fit that gender construct. I watched the talks. Saw them from start to finish. Have had these conversations with people. For something that is supposedly based on science a lot of it based on subjective opinion of "im in the wrong body". The woman born with gonads is clearly not in that category. You'll also note that identity politics is a bigger part of this than the I was born in an ambiguous body. Re: General Discussions - ElwoodBlues1 - 06-27-2022 (06-27-2022, 08:41 AM)Mav link Wrote:Would a castrated Mitchell Starc who underwent a course of estrogen injections still bowl at 150 km/h? If the answer is yes, then why does WADA ban steroids and testerone as PEDs?If former male transgender athletes were allowed to play female sports like test cricket it's doubtful that normal female born athletes would be able to make the team such would be the advantage the former male transgender athletes would have. A castrated Mitch Starc bowling at 140k would be too much for the normal female used to 125k thunderbolts. Re: General Discussions - Mav - 06-27-2022 So gender reassignment would only cost Starc 10 km/h? Is there some research that justifies that assumption? Could it be he'd drop 20 km/h or more? Could gender reassignment force Starc to alter his bowling action and make it hard for him to generate late swing at the lower top pace? And when do you think that all the best male bowlers in the world are going to transition just so they can star as women? This is a scare campaign which is laughable on its face. Re: General Discussions - LP - 06-27-2022 As an adult transitioning, an athlete like Starc if he decides to keep up the training so he could compete as an alternate gender, would lose very little of nothing at all. Which is the key difference between an adult transitioning and some kid who goes through procedures pre-puberty! You didn't answer my earlier question, if a female transitions to male do they still get to play women's sport if they choose to do so? The prospect of that happening is no more absurd than Mouncey wanting to play a female contact sport! Re: General Discussions - ElwoodBlues1 - 06-27-2022 (06-27-2022, 09:43 AM)Mav link Wrote:So gender reassignment would only cost Starc 10 km/h? Is there some research that justifies that assumption? Could it be he'd drop 20 km/h or more? Could gender reassignment force Starc to alter his bowling action and make it hard for him to generate late swing at the lower top pace?This my point they wouldn't need to be the best male bowlers or the best footballers or the best basketballers. Just bigger, stronger and capable of physical acts that far exceed what a normal non transgender female could be capable of. District cricket is full of bowlers who can bowl at speed, doesn't mean they are any good but they would scare and injure female players just like Hannah Mouncey would playing football. Re: General Discussions - Mav - 06-27-2022 Wow, who needs science when we can just make claims without evidence? Apparently, a man who decides to keep up the training so he could compete as an alternate gender would lose very little or nothing at all. And they would be bigger, stronger and capable of physical acts that far exceed what a normal non transgender female could be capable of. Please point me to the evidence rather than the supposition. By the way, a big District cricketer who is castrated and injected with estrogen won’t necessarily scare women cricketers any more. The Romans were no longer scared of Samson after Delilah cut off his hair. They mocked him instead. Only a special deal with God enabled him to pull down the temple. I’m guessing testicles are more powerful than hair. Re: General Discussions - madbluboy - 06-27-2022 Of course they lose something but there is a huge gap between male and female performances in most sport. If Tyson Fury became Tyra Fury you're not going to put another woman in the ring with her. Re: General Discussions - Mav - 06-27-2022 Boxing has weight divisions. Who is able to say whether a transgender female boxer in the same weight division as an equally experienced and well-trained female in that category would have an advantage? I'm not willing to accept sweeping assumptions. I don't care how vehemently you make an assertion as vehemence does not equal proof. Trump has given bombast a bad name now. |