![]() |
|
9/11 Debate - Printable Version +- Carlton Supporters Club (http://new.carltonsc.com) +-- Forum: Social Club (http://new.carltonsc.com/forum-6.html) +--- Forum: Blah-Blah Bar (http://new.carltonsc.com/forum-23.html) +--- Thread: 9/11 Debate (/thread-5114.html) |
Re: 9/11 Debate - Mav - 03-21-2021 I wonder whether there were conspiracy theories floating around after the Challenger Space Shuttle blew up. The Russians had a motive to cripple the US Space program as did the Europeans as they were involved in launching satellites via their Ariadne rockets. Could the official explanation of degraded O-rings really explain the explosion when there had been numerous successful launches without any problem in that regard? Re: 9/11 Debate - LP - 03-21-2021 (03-21-2021, 02:38 AM)Mav date Wrote:I wonder whether there were conspiracy theories floating around after the Challenger Space Shuttle blew up. The Russians had a motive to cripple the US Space program as did the Europeans as they were involved in launching satellites via their Ariadne rockets. Could the official explanation of degraded O-rings really explain the explosion when there had been numerous successful launches without any problem in that regard?The Aricebo Radio Telescope was destroyed by the Chinese who want the world to rent and help pay for the 500m FAST they have already built. :o ;D :
Re: 9/11 Debate - Lods - 03-21-2021 Listen to Beatles albums. They've left heaps of clues in their music and album covers. ;D Re: 9/11 Debate - DJC - 03-21-2021 (03-21-2021, 02:09 AM)Baggers link Wrote:If you check out the footage you'll see the fire in building 7 was contained to one specific area... yet the entire building collapsed uniformly. Check out the FAQs on the National Institute of Standards and Technology website: Quote:4. What caused the fires in WTC 7? Re: 9/11 Debate - LP - 03-21-2021 (03-21-2021, 04:07 AM)DJC date Wrote:Check out the FAQs on the National Institute of Standards and Technology website:Even basic analysis of undoctored footage shows the collapse didn't happen in free fall at all, the base claim of the conspiracists is dead and buried before it even remains standing! You have to be careful which video you choose, there are plenty out there in circulation where the frame rate has been doctored to show the building collapsing in free fall, but they are brought undone by sequences and small debris which then appear in doctored videos to fall faster than gravity despite being on ballistic trajectories. Re: 9/11 Debate - capcom - 03-21-2021 (03-21-2021, 02:38 AM)Mav link Wrote:I wonder whether there were conspiracy theories floating around after the Challenger Space Shuttle blew up. The Russians had a motive to cripple the US Space program as did the Europeans as they were involved in launching satellites via their Ariadne rockets. Could the official explanation of degraded O-rings really explain the explosion when there had been numerous successful launches without any problem in that regard? There were a few. 24 flights in all before 51L. ALL had some level of "blow by" on the Solid Rocket Boosters before the O rings were redesigned to cover for any shrinkage in the seals if a "go" was given in cold weather. Morton Thiokol (SRB manufacturers told NASA to scrub the flight on the 51L launch morning) That warning was ignored, and disaster followed. It was freezing on the 26th January and major ice on the gantry. The exhaust from the right hand SRB section just burnt thru and collapsed the bottom struts holding the booster to the external tank. G forces, after the strut gave way, swung the solid rocket booster straight into the full loaded external tank. And once ignited, the SRBs cannot be controlled or shut down All 110 missions that followed 51L worked to perfection. Re: 9/11 Debate - LP - 03-21-2021 So humans aren't perfect, and it's not always disaster by negligence or deliberate design. ![]() What will the lawyers do, who will they sue! :o Re: 9/11 Debate - kruddler - 03-21-2021 (03-21-2021, 01:28 AM)northernblue link Wrote:How many individual buildings have had 767’s deliberately crashed into them ?I'm not sure of the answer, but i know there are at least 3 other buildings that have been crashed into by planes and survived....easily. Technically, you could add the 2 WTC's into that too, because planes didn't bring them down either.
Re: 9/11 Debate - kruddler - 03-21-2021 (03-20-2021, 12:18 PM)LP link Wrote:I doubt I'll get anything about physics, materials or engineering from it. Just another example of how you are wrong. THis is the thing that people don't get.....not all conspiracies are equal. I said it from the beginning, physics calls BS on this one. Not flat earth, fake moon landings....whatever. They are not linked in any way apart from the mind of person disrespecting them. Yes, the whole thing is unlikely. Doesn't mean its not true. Some random pattern clerk was probably a billion to one to change the world, but here we are. Re: 9/11 Debate - LP - 03-21-2021 (03-21-2021, 04:57 AM)kruddler date Wrote:I'm not sure of the answer, but i know there are at least 3 other buildings that have been crashed into by planes and survived....easily.The next biggest equivalent crash was a B-25 into the Empire State Building. B-25 = 15m wide x 15,000kg flying at 230mph. 767 = 40m wide x 150,000 to 200,000kg MTOW flying at +550mph. 10x the weight and at least 2x the speed, We need a physicist to tell us all about kinetic and potential energy!
|