Carlton Supporters Club
CV and mad panic behaviour - Printable Version

+- Carlton Supporters Club (http://new.carltonsc.com)
+-- Forum: Social Club (http://new.carltonsc.com/forum-6.html)
+--- Forum: Blah-Blah Bar (http://new.carltonsc.com/forum-23.html)
+--- Thread: CV and mad panic behaviour (/thread-4651.html)

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 520 521 522 523 524 525 526 527 528 529 530 531 532 533 534 535 536 537 538 539 540 541 542 543 544 545 546 547 548 549 550 551 552 553 554 555 556 557 558 559 560 561 562 563 564 565 566 567 568 569 570 571 572 573 574 575 576 577 578 579 580 581 582 583 584 585 586 587 588 589 590 591 592 593 594 595 596 597 598 599 600 601 602 603 604 605 606 607 608 609 610 611 612 613 614 615 616 617 618 619 620 621 622 623 624 625 626 627 628 629 630 631 632 633 634 635 636 637 638 639 640 641 642 643 644 645 646 647 648 649 650 651 652 653 654 655 656 657 658 659 660 661 662 663 664 665 666 667 668 669 670 671 672 673 674 675 676 677 678 679 680 681 682 683 684 685 686 687 688 689 690 691 692 693 694 695 696 697 698 699 700 701 702 703 704 705 706 707 708 709 710 711 712 713 714 715 716 717 718 719 720 721 722 723 724 725 726 727 728 729 730 731 732 733 734 735 736 737 738 739 740 741 742 743

Re: CV and mad panic behaviour - rocky - 07-13-2020

(07-13-2020, 12:31 AM)flyboy77 link Wrote:You got that right.

The only reason we're in lock down now is that the quarantine processes were deficient.

Dan finds the Coronavirus important enough to put his dopey, ugly scone on TV every day but was incapable of ensuring adequate procedures (and the right human resources) were in place.

That is a fact.

You really think he wasn't aware that Pallas had hived off the security gig to some union cronies?

That would be naive in the extreme.

The buck stops with him. What the f... else is he doing?

You may disagree but that's the way the game works and should work. For all sides of politics.
That covers it perfectly. Thinks people will forget come election time. I don't even know what the other blokes name is but he'll be getting my vote before Dan. Even consider voting Green before him. No, only kidding. Nothing could make me vote Green.

Re: CV and mad panic behaviour - Professer E - 07-13-2020

Andrew's has got a lot right and a lot wrong.

But  Andrew's isn't responsible for people's behaviour: the skank who supposedly swapped a bit for a shopping trip,  and the guard who participated should be held responsible for their actions.

Re: CV and mad panic behaviour - Gointocarlton - 07-13-2020

(07-13-2020, 04:51 AM)rocky link Wrote:That covers it perfectly. Thinks people will forget come election time. I don't even know what the other blokes name is but he'll be getting my vote before Dan. Even consider voting Green before him. No, only kidding. Nothing could make me vote Green.
Thats just a bridge too far.

Re: CV and mad panic behaviour - LP - 07-13-2020

Sad to hear about Bachar Houli's mum in ICU.

SARS-CoV-2 doesn't play favourites.

Re: CV and mad panic behaviour - Professer E - 07-13-2020

..and people think that the other mob would have done a better job than Andrews???  Really,  oh ROFLMAO...

O'Brien, Lobster Boy ET AL... Oh that's rich.

Re: CV and mad panic behaviour - Thryleon - 07-13-2020

https://7news.com.au/sport/afl/richmond-star-bachar-houli-reveals-his-mother-is-in-icu-battling-covid-19-c-1162758

Meanwhile, this time last week there were 0 cases in ICU.

This is why they are locking us down.

Re: CV and mad panic behaviour - DJC - 07-13-2020

(07-13-2020, 07:56 AM)Professer E link Wrote:..and people think that the other mob would have done a better job than Andrews???  Really,  oh ROFLMAO...

O'Brien, Lobster Boy ET AL... Oh that's rich.

Priceless Prof  Smile

Re: CV and mad panic behaviour - jeza - 07-13-2020

(07-13-2020, 12:28 AM)Thryleon link Wrote:At the end of the day, this biggest problem isn't the idea of putting security in that role.


(07-13-2020, 12:28 AM)Thryleon link Wrote:That whole event has been politicised, and left a very sour note in my mouth because with every Andrews argument I hear, I see information conveniently ignored because it doesnt fit the rhetoric.  You can see confirmation bias and hypocrisy in every argument.

Disagree with most of your post but those 2 bits sh## the most.

The biggest problem was the approach to quarantine which lead to the appointment of security guards. Not one decision they made along the way made any sense then or now.

The bit about how this is somehow "politicised" is really poor. I voted for Dan and have been a big fan. That doesn't mean I'll blindly follow every dumb thing he does. So just because you're viewing everything through a "politicised" lense doesn't mean everybody else is.

Re: CV and mad panic behaviour - Thryleon - 07-13-2020

(07-13-2020, 11:34 AM)jeza link Wrote:Disagree with most of your post but those 2 bits sh## the most.

The biggest problem was the approach to quarantine which lead to the appointment of security guards. Not one decision they made along the way made any sense then or now.

The bit about how this is somehow "politicised" is really poor. I voted for Dan and have been a big fan. That doesn't mean I'll blindly follow every dumb thing he does. So just because you're viewing everything through a "politicised" lense doesn't mean everybody else is.

Sorry jeza, you may not agree with me and thats fine but as someone who sees politicians as leeches on society I find it ironic that people are talking about him pandering to his crony union mates regarding the hotels.

I dont think you need to train someone to not let people out and not screw them during  pandemic.

The people in quarantine are more culpable than any guard or any policy.

You might agree you might not, but the actions of people and the outcome speaka for itself.

Fwiw there's still no concrete proof the hotels were the root cause of the issue.

Re: CV and mad panic behaviour - flyboy77 - 07-13-2020

(07-13-2020, 05:49 AM)Professer E link Wrote:Andrew's has got a lot right and a lot wrong.

But  Andrew's isn't responsible for people's behaviour: the skank who supposedly swapped a bit for a shopping trip,  and the guard who participated should be held responsible for their actions.

No but he's certainly responsible for ensuring rock solid processes and policies are in place such that the virus didn't escape back into the community (from quarantine).

The CHO essentially reaffirmed today that it's highly likely all current cases stem from the quarantine breach.

Dan hasn't had a more important responsibility during his tenure.

And he royally f^%$d it up.

the blunder will cost the economy further billions, keeps 1000s of kids out of school and cause a whole heap more pain & grief on 10s of 1000s of people.

That's on him. If you wanna be the big kahuna you take the good and you take the bad.

In any private organisation, he'd be gone by now.

It's facile to say he can't be blamed for others' action. Even puerile.