![]() |
|
Football Department Review - Printable Version +- Carlton Supporters Club (http://new.carltonsc.com) +-- Forum: Princes Park (http://new.carltonsc.com/forum-4.html) +--- Forum: Robert Heatley Stand (http://new.carltonsc.com/forum-14.html) +--- Thread: Football Department Review (/thread-5260.html) Pages:
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
|
Re: Football Department Review - LP - 08-19-2021 (08-18-2021, 10:41 PM)Gointocarlton date Wrote:What we do know is:Didn't they announced a review of the whole club, but it doesn't seem to be playing out that way! For me it's a Clayton's Review, they had an objective, they wanted a very specific outcome, and they made sure that is what it delivers! I'm wondering if this review was any more than just an audition for Geoff Walsh, while at the same time offering some cover for Sayer's preferred list of changes? Re: Football Department Review - Gointocarlton - 08-19-2021 (08-19-2021, 12:32 AM)LP link Wrote:Didn't they announced a review of the whole club, but it doesn't seem to be playing out that way!For me, for once the club was clear in that it was stated to be a review of the whole footy dept. That is, everyone from Judd down to the boot studder. Re: Football Department Review - ElwoodBlues1 - 08-19-2021 (08-19-2021, 12:32 AM)LP link Wrote:Didn't they announced a review of the whole club, but it doesn't seem to be playing out that way!Its been denied that Walsh is being courted for any football admin role......however I remain skeptical given how quickly people change their minds in the world of AFL. Re: Football Department Review - northernblue - 08-19-2021 (08-19-2021, 01:36 AM)ElwoodBlues1 link Wrote:Its been denied that Walsh is being courted for any football admin role......however I remain skeptical given how quickly people change their minds in the world of AFL. It would appear slightly unethical to be employed to review an organisation and thus find that the best way forward is to employ yourself full time... But thats just me. Re: Football Department Review - PaulP - 08-19-2021 https://www.afl.com.au/news/666643/unless-ross-knows-something-then-i-plan-to-coach-next-year-teague Well worth a read, but it's a little depressing tbh. Re: Football Department Review - Gointocarlton - 08-19-2021 (08-19-2021, 01:47 AM)PaulP link Wrote:https://www.afl.com.au/news/666643/unless-ross-knows-something-then-i-plan-to-coach-next-year-teagueAbit mischievous by Beveridge IMO. Re: Football Department Review - Milhanna13 - 08-19-2021 (08-19-2021, 01:47 AM)PaulP link Wrote:https://www.afl.com.au/news/666643/unless-ross-knows-something-then-i-plan-to-coach-next-year-teague Bit mischievous in the wordings from the journo - saying the review findings had been presented to the board. Haven’t the board come out and said the review isn’t finished. Yeah, they prob should keep Teague updated, but the article makes it sound like they have the results and they are keeping them from Teague Re: Football Department Review - Milhanna13 - 08-19-2021 (08-19-2021, 02:01 AM)Gointocarlton link Wrote:Abit mischievous by Beveridge IMO. Ha! Hadn’t read ur response when I typed mine. Great minds!!!! Re: Football Department Review - PaulP - 08-19-2021 (08-19-2021, 02:01 AM)Gointocarlton link Wrote:Abit mischievous by Beveridge IMO. Maybe, but I think Lyon is acting unethically, saying that he has "famous" Carlton people in his corner, and then talking about how Clarkson is the red hot favourite. And the reason why the club hasn't backed Teague publicly is obvious. It's been a pretty grubby process, and all concerned should hang their heads in shame. There's no honour among thieves or senior coaches, it seems. Re: Football Department Review - Gointocarlton - 08-19-2021 (08-19-2021, 02:04 AM)Milhanna13 link Wrote:Bit mischievous in the wordings from the journo - saying the review findings had been presented to the board. Haven’t the board come out and said the review isn’t finished. Yeah, they prob should keep Teague updated, but the article makes it sound like they have the results and they are keeping them from TeagueAgree Mil, Ill also add that Teagues comments come across as a bit naive if I'm honest. They said they wouldnt be providing running commentry and they havent. So how can he expect them to come out and say things about it? Also, he would have known, being an insider, the review was ongoing and not complete. How could he expect them to go up to him and say "you'll be right mate" when the review wasnt complete. Perhaps its me thats naive. |