Carlton Supporters Club
CV and mad panic behaviour - Printable Version

+- Carlton Supporters Club (http://new.carltonsc.com)
+-- Forum: Social Club (http://new.carltonsc.com/forum-6.html)
+--- Forum: Blah-Blah Bar (http://new.carltonsc.com/forum-23.html)
+--- Thread: CV and mad panic behaviour (/thread-4651.html)

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 520 521 522 523 524 525 526 527 528 529 530 531 532 533 534 535 536 537 538 539 540 541 542 543 544 545 546 547 548 549 550 551 552 553 554 555 556 557 558 559 560 561 562 563 564 565 566 567 568 569 570 571 572 573 574 575 576 577 578 579 580 581 582 583 584 585 586 587 588 589 590 591 592 593 594 595 596 597 598 599 600 601 602 603 604 605 606 607 608 609 610 611 612 613 614 615 616 617 618 619 620 621 622 623 624 625 626 627 628 629 630 631 632 633 634 635 636 637 638 639 640 641 642 643 644 645 646 647 648 649 650 651 652 653 654 655 656 657 658 659 660 661 662 663 664 665 666 667 668 669 670 671 672 673 674 675 676 677 678 679 680 681 682 683 684 685 686 687 688 689 690 691 692 693 694 695 696 697 698 699 700 701 702 703 704 705 706 707 708 709 710 711 712 713 714 715 716 717 718 719 720 721 722 723 724 725 726 727 728 729 730 731 732 733 734 735 736 737 738 739 740 741 742 743


Re: CV and mad panic behaviour - Gointocarlton - 07-07-2020

(07-07-2020, 05:40 AM)cookie2 link Wrote:Well back to the lock down.
Yep, 6w from 11:59pm tomorrow, Melb metro and Mitchell Shire.


Re: CV and mad panic behaviour - capcom - 07-07-2020

Interesting developments in our town.  Businesses are no longer exactly welcoming out of town tourists.  Seems like they learned from the last time when they blew in and took large quantities of stock ordered for the locals.   




Re: CV and mad panic behaviour - LP - 07-07-2020

(07-07-2020, 06:29 AM)capcom date Wrote:Interesting developments in our town.  Businesses are no longer exactly welcoming out of town tourists.  Seems like they learned from the last time when they blew in and took large quantities of stock ordered for the locals.
Good, these roaming parasites are actually part of the problem!


Re: CV and mad panic behaviour - Baggers - 07-07-2020

(07-07-2020, 06:29 AM)capcom link Wrote:Interesting developments in our town.  Businesses are no longer exactly welcoming out of town tourists.  Seems like they learned from the last time when they blew in and took large quantities of stock ordered for the locals.   

Likewise here. Suddenly, the holiday homes and AirB'nBs are filling up! Once the constabulary does a sweep of number plates over the next few days I expect a few to get their marching orders... along with a fine.


Re: CV and mad panic behaviour - flyboy77 - 07-07-2020

(07-07-2020, 05:56 AM)LP link Wrote:Any chance of referencing some peer review articles from non-predatory journals that aren't using fake or redundant researcher profiles?

Do you know what Open Access infers?

I suppose probably not, the audited journals are not going to risk their reputation allowing this rubbish to be self-published without peer review.

Nobody is going to seriously claim that HCQ is "the missing link" when it's given with a barrage of other drugs including other powerful antibiotics. Perhaps the circular referencing is a hint, it may be worthwhile spending some time reading up on correlation versus causation, and how much work is required to get from a correlation to a causation, the answers won't be available this year!

Ah, so you resort to ad hominem attack.

The play of the average intellect.

Missing link? wtf does that mean. Multiple observational studies in multiple independent jurisdictions have show the 'blend' to be extremely highly effective if given as an early stage treatment....and in the right dosages.

What, you reckon it's all made up?

Dispute the evidence not the non "peer review journal"...

Should I recount the Lancet's last lame effort to discredit HCQ?

Weak as piss LP. Put up of something of substance or STFU.


Re: CV and mad panic behaviour - flyboy77 - 07-07-2020

(07-07-2020, 05:51 AM)LP link Wrote:It's fine, it is relative to other diseases which is perfectly relevant.

As opposed to some the figures you've quoted below, like;Hmm, officially India report about 20K deaths from 700K cases, that 20/700 * 100 = 3%

The thing that is extraordinary about India is that it is not like Brazil, at least yet, the strongest drivers of COVID-19 deaths versus cases are socio-economic! Of course India, unlike yourself and Brazil, isn't in denial about COVID-19, India took it very very seriously right from the start.

CFRs are BS numbers, but no doubt you know that....

You think I made that up?

14 deaths per million. It's a piss in the wind to the other stuff they've faced through history.

https://www.worldometers.info/coronavirus/#countries

And the chart is BS by any metric - you can't simply omit a dozen or so of the top causes of death to make a point.

It's clear you have an agenda, so be it.

Thankfully, the data speaks for itself.




Re: CV and mad panic behaviour - LP - 07-07-2020

(07-07-2020, 10:26 AM)flyboy77 date Wrote:CFRs are BS numbers, but no doubt you know that....

You think I made that up?

14 deaths per million. It's a piss in the wind to the other stuff they've faced through history.

https://www.worldometers.info/coronavirus/#countries

And the chart is BS by any metric - you can't simply omit a dozen or so of the top causes of death to make a point.

It's clear you have an agenda, so be it.

Thankfully, the data speaks for itself.
RUOK Flyboy?

The thing that is a bit disturbing is that you looked at the Flourish graph and immediately focused on millions of deaths that should be counted above COVID-19, that is if the chart had every possible means of death listed. Trivializing and discounting the thousands of people who have died from COVID-19 related complications, and even in our own town many more who may in light of the post restriction reckless behavior that is promoted by similar outlooks to your own!

You've constructed a disturbing and destructive model of reality that gets reinforced every time you read some questionable facts or dubious data relationship, while immediately disregarding the real figures and lives lost. The problems isn't the figures, COVID-19 isn't a conspiracy, it's a pandemic that is killing people and you should consider those with friends and family who have been harmed or perished before you trivialize it further.


Re: CV and mad panic behaviour - flyboy77 - 07-07-2020

(07-07-2020, 10:33 AM)LP link Wrote:RUOK Flyboy?

The thing that is a bit disturbing is that you looked at the Flourish graph and immediately focused on millions of deaths that should be counted above COVID-19, that is if the chart had every possible means of death listed. Trivializing and discounting the thousands of people who have died from COVID-19 related complications, and even in our own town many more who may in light of the post restriction reckless behavior that is promoted by similar outlooks to your own!

You've constructed a disturbing and destructive model of reality that gets reinforced every time you read some questionable facts or dubious data relationship, while immediately disregarding the real figures and lives lost. The problems isn't the figures, COVID-19 isn't a conspiracy, it's a pandemic that is killing people and you should consider those with friends and family who have been harmed or perished before you trivialize it further.

Is that your best LP?

I saw the chart and immediately knew it was a con job as it omitted (likely by design) a dozen or so of the leading causes of death annually.

I note you don't dispute or refute the full list of causes I posted.

Your pitch refutes the data. Hard data.

Are you really a scientist? Did you fail maths at school?

Plenty of things kill us, we don't stop 'life' as we know it....the play book is well known, a pity politics got in the way.

The US? COVID is a created crisis.... IL, MA, MI, NJ, NY, PA State governors made nursing homes accept sick folk = mass deaths. Huge numbers!

The balance of US States, COVID seldom broke CDC's epidemic threshold.....

COVID is a virus that we now know can be readily managed - and contained - well it would be, but for the folk with agendas, political or otherwise.




Re: CV and mad panic behaviour - LP - 07-07-2020

(07-07-2020, 10:43 AM)flyboy77 date Wrote:I saw the chart and immediately knew it was a con job as it omitted (likely by design) a dozen or so of the leading causes of death annually.

Are you really a scientist? Did you fail maths at school?
I did learn some math, I think it was called subsets.

Lucky for the USA, eh?

Let see what your Worldometer source says about that non-epidemic threshold fake fact!
https://www.worldometers.info/coronavirus/#countries

Trump would probably even disown that one! Big Grin


Re: CV and mad panic behaviour - flyboy77 - 07-07-2020

(07-07-2020, 11:05 AM)LP link Wrote:I did learn some math, I think it was called subsets.

Get a refresher.

No comment on the efficacy of the PCR test?

https://off-guardian.org/2020/06/27/covid19-pcr-tests-are-scientifically-meaningless/?fbclid=IwAR2jn-7-W7hg4c6TQ1vJIogyvgz0I3UJR3EJss4XC06RhoL8oBv16izuilI

or even this

https://www.cell.com/cell/fulltext/S0092-8674(20)30610-3

or this

https://www.nicholaslewis.org/why-herd-immunity-to-covid-19-is-reached-much-earlier-than-thought/

ps you can't really believe the peer review process has any substance surely?

As for your alleged fake fact, try here....

https://coronavirusbellcurve.com/

get back to me.