+- Carlton Supporters Club (http://new.carltonsc.com)
+-- Forum: Social Club (http://new.carltonsc.com/forum-6.html)
+--- Forum: Blah-Blah Bar (http://new.carltonsc.com/forum-23.html)
+--- Thread: Trumpled (Alternative Leading) (/thread-2312.html)
Pages:
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
338
339
340
341
342
343
344
345
346
347
348
349
350
351
352
353
354
355
356
357
358
359
360
361
362
363
364
365
366
367
368
369
370
371
372
373
374
375
376
377
378
379
380
381
382
383
384
Re: US Presidential Election 2016 - cookie2 - 10-03-2016
(10-02-2016, 10:55 PM)sandsmere link Wrote:She won't control Putin.
Whichever one of these 2 ridiculous candidates gets in won't control Putin. Or his Chinese counterpart for that matter.
Uncle Sam will be in a sorry old state by the end of the next 4 years.
I fear you will be proved right S !
And we may well get dragged in.
Re: US Presidential Election 2016 - Mav - 10-04-2016
Trump's had a horrible week and he desperately needs some help from his friends to change momentum. Sure enough, Assange is happy to act as Putin's puppet. He is trying to organise a press conference in Berlin to release leaks against Clinton. He had intended to do it from the balcony of the Ecuadorean Embassy but he changed his mind as he fears an assassination attempt. He released a document that suggested that Clinton had asked back in 2010 whether they could just "drone him".
The press conference is scheduled for tonight, our time.
https://www.cnet.com/au/news/julian-assange-speech-berlin-due-to-specific-information-wikileaks-hillary-clinton-drone-strike/.
If he's wary of assassination attempts, maybe that's the reason he seems to confine himself to stuff that embarrasses the US. If he embarrassed Putin, not only might he be assassinated but also it would be done in such as way that his death would be as painful and lingering as possible. Alexander Litvinenko was poisoned in 2006 in England with Polonium 210 which left him with fatal acute radiation syndrome after defecting. And journalists who criticise Putin in Russia seem to die of unnatural causes at an alarming rate. Being a lapdog for Putin and his hackers is a far safer option.
Re: US Presidential Election 2016 - LP - 10-04-2016
(10-04-2016, 03:38 AM)Mav link Wrote:Trump's had a horrible week and he desperately needs some help from his friends to change momentum. Sure enough, Assange is happy to act as Putin's puppet. He is trying to organise a press conference in Berlin to release leaks against Clinton. He had intended to do it from the balcony of the Ecuadorean Embassy but he changed his mind as he fears an assassination attempt. He released a document that suggested that Clinton had asked back in 2010 whether they could just "drone him".
So he'll support the guy who is happy to imply that if you've got nukes you should use them!
Re: US Presidential Election 2016 - Lods - 10-04-2016
Assange is hell bent on disrupting Hillary's campaign.
Trump hasn't offended him.
He's operating at a base personal level.
Re: US Presidential Election 2016 - Mav - 10-04-2016
Wonder if he's going to pursue the vendetta by continuing to stoke the conspiracy theory over Seth Rich's murder. Mr. Rich was a low-level DNC employee who was killed in the streets in an apparent robbery attempt. Right-wing conspiracy nuts have tried to tie the Clintons to an amazing number of deaths and they theorised the Clintons must have killed him over DNC leaks to Wikileaks. However, he had a very low level position which the DNC says wouldn't have given him access to those emails. But Assange fanned the flames by saying that a Wikileaks source re the DNC dump had been murdered. If he tries to beat this story up, he better have some good evidence to support the claim. As Lods says, he appears to harbour a personal vendetta towards Clinton and I, at least, would be sceptical if he makes an unsupported claim that Rich was murdered over the DNC dump.
Re: US Presidential Election 2016 - Mav - 10-04-2016
He says he won't do it today but will do it later - http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3821062/Is-moment-tank-Hillary-s-campaign-Julian-Assange-set-speak-WikiLeaks-conference-promising-release-damaging-information-Clinton.html.
Re: US Presidential Election 2016 - Mav - 10-04-2016
How funny! Right-wing wingnuts were convinced that Assange was going to follow through on his teaser that he was about to kill off Clinton's campaign. They donned their tinfoil hats and tuned in to the broadcast expecting to experience that rush that fans feel when the final siren goes to confirm their team's grand final victory. Instead, Assange trolled the world.
Assange used his big moment to spruik how brilliant Wikileaks has been and encourage contributions. In the middle of this, he said he wouldn't be making a big release of Clinton documents when it was 3am in the US!
Alex Jones did a live broadcast on his Infowars channel and you can see in the following clip what happened in wingnut homes across the US. He exploded and agreed with his offsider that they'd been "Wikirolled" and concluded that Assange had nothing. And Jones showed why he's the king of conspiracists, launching a conspiracy theory that Clinton had done a deal to set Assange free if he buried the incriminating evidence. Assange has sold out and Wikileaks is dead, apparently!
[flash=200,200]https://youtu.be/2aDWWyWc_Lc[/flash]
Re: US Presidential Election 2016 - Baggers - 10-05-2016
(10-04-2016, 11:25 PM)Mav link Wrote:How funny! Right-wing wingnuts were convinced that Assange was going to follow through on his teaser that he was about to kill off Clinton's campaign. They donned their tinfoil hats and tuned in to the broadcast expecting to experience that rush that fans feel when the final siren goes to confirm their team's grand final victory. Instead, Assange trolled the world.
Assange used his big moment to spruik how brilliant Wikileaks has been and encourage contributions. In the middle of this, he said he wouldn't be making a big release of Clinton documents when it was 3am in the US!
Alex Jones did a live broadcast on his Infowars channel and you can see in the following clip what happened in wingnut homes across the US. He exploded and agreed with his offsider that they'd been "Wikirolled" and concluded that Assange had nothing. And Jones showed why he's the king of conspiracists, launching a conspiracy theory that Clinton had done a deal to set Assange free if he buried the incriminating evidence. Assange has sold out and Wikileaks is dead, apparently!
[flash=200,200]https://youtu.be/2aDWWyWc_Lc[/flash]
Well put. Alex Jones, sheesh, what a knob... though I do like your term 'wingnut'.
Re: US Presidential Election 2016 - Lods - 10-06-2016
Vice presidential debate was a draw....winner depended on which side you favour by the looks of the commentary ;D
Re: US Presidential Election 2016 - Mav - 10-06-2016
The majority view is that Pence won but maybe that this won't be much help to Trump.
First, it was only a VP debate, so Pence would have needed to win big to help Trump and no one thinks he did that. On the flip side, Kaine mostly needed to avoid unforced errors which could be used to beat Clinton over the head and he succeeded in staying safe.
Secondly, he won the debate by refusing to admit that Trump had said certain things or had certain policies. That blunted Kaine's attack as you need to get that concession before you ask the opponent to defend that statement or policy. He did a fine job of boasting of his own conservative credentials but Trump is not a conservative of Pence's ilk. Pence didn't do his prospects for a run in 2020 any harm at all.
Thirdly, Kaine was clearly aiming his attack at Trump rather than trying to disqualify Pence, so the Clinton camp is less concerned about who won the debate as a separate entity than how it affected the attitudes of swing voters towards Trump. That's much harder to assess as a discrete issue in opinion polls. Perhaps the only part of the debate which will feature in a negative ad will be when Pence gave up an unforced error in referring to "whipping out that Mexican thing" in a dismissive way which adds insult to injury in the Latino community.